Plant Physiology 100:669-676 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists
Environmental and Stress Physiology
Hydraulic Conductivity Recovery versus Water Pressure in Xylem of Acer saccharum1
Melvin T. Tyree and
Shudong Yang
Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, United States Forest Service, Burlington, Vermont 05402,
Department of Botany, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405
Experiments were conducted to determine the influence of stem diameter, xylem pressure potential, and temperature on the rate of recovery of hydraulic conductivity in embolized stems of Acer saccharum Marsh. Recovery of conductivity was accompanied by an increase in stem water content as water replaced air bubbles and bubbles dissolved from vessels into the surrounding water. The time required for stems to go from less than 3 to 100% hydraulic conductivity increased approximately with the square of the stem diameter and increased with decreasing xylem pressure potential. Recovery was halted when xylem pressure potential decreased below 6 kPa. Increasing xylem pressure from 13 to 150 kPa reduced the time for recovery by a factor of 4. Temperature had little influence on the rate of recovery of hydraulic conductivity. All of these results are in accord with a theory of bubble dissolution in which it is assumed that: (a) the rate of bubble dissolution is rate limited by diffusion of air from the bubbles to the outer surface of the stems, (b) the equilibrium concentration of gases in liquid in stems is determined by Henry's law at all air-water interfaces, (c) the equilibrium solubility concentration is determined only by the partial pressure of the gas in the gas phase and not directly by the liquid-phase pressure, and (d) the gas pressure of an entrapped air bubble in the lumen of a cell can never be less than atmospheric pressure at equilibrium.
1 Financial support was provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture grants No. 88-33520-4073 and 88-34157-3749.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Rosell and M. E. Olson
Testing implicit assumptions regarding the age vs. size dependence of stem biomechanics using Pittocaulon (Senecio) praecox (Asteraceae)
Am. J. Botany,
February 1, 2007;
94(2):
161 - 172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Cochard, F. Froux, S. Mayr, and C. Coutand
Xylem Wall Collapse in Water-Stressed Pine Needles
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2004;
134(1):
401 - 408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. V. Minorsky
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2003;
131(1):
6 - 7.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Zwieniecki, P. J. Melcher, and N. M. Holbrook
Hydraulic properties of individual xylem vessels of Fraxinus americana
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2001;
52(355):
257 - 264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Cochard, C. Bodet, T. Améglio, and P. Cruiziat
Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy Observations of Vessel Content during Transpiration in Walnut Petioles. Facts or Artifacts?
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2000;
124(3):
1191 - 1202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Holbrook and M. A. Zwieniecki
Embolism Repair and Xylem Tension: Do We Need a Miracle?
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 1999;
120(1):
7 - 10.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Tyree, S. Salleo, A. Nardini, M. Assunta Lo Gullo, and R. Mosca
Refilling of Embolized Vessels in Young Stems of Laurel. Do We Need a New Paradigm?
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 1999;
120(1):
11 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|