Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 100:1310-1317 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyystjärvi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Aro, E.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyystjärvi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Aro, E.-M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tyystjärvi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Aro, E.-M.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Slow Degradation of the D1 Protein Is Related to the Susceptibility of Low-Light-Grown Pumpkin Plants to Photoinhibition 1

Esa Tyystjärvi, Kati Ali-Yrkkö, Reetta Kettunen and Eva-Mari Aro

Department of Biology, University of Turku, SF 20700 Turku, Finland

Photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII) electron transport and subsequent degradation of the D1 protein were studied in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) leaves developed under high (1000 µmol m–2 s–1) and low (80 µmol m–2 s–1) photon flux densities. The low-light leaves were more susceptible to high light. This difference was greatly diminished when illumination was performed in the presence of chloramphenicol, indicating that a poor capacity to repair photodamaged PSII centers is decisive in the susceptibility of low-light leaves to photoinhibition. In fact, the first phases of the repair cycle, degradation and removal of photodamaged D1 protein from the reaction center complex, occurred slowly in low-light leaves, whereas in high-light leaves the degradation of the D1 protein more readily followed photoinhibition of PSII electron transport. A modified form of the D1 protein, with slightly slower electrophoretic mobility than the original D1, accumulated in the appressed thylakoid membranes of low-light leaves during illumination and was subsequently degraded only slowly.


1 This work was supported by the Academy of Finland.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
T. D. Tsonev and K. Hikosaka
Contribution of Photosynthetic Electron Transport, Heat Dissipation, and Recovery of Photoinactivated Photosystem II to Photoprotection at Different Temperatures in Chenopodium album Leaves
Plant Cell Physiol., August 15, 2003; 44(8): 828 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Patsikka, M. Kairavuo, F. Sersen, E.-M. Aro, and E. Tyystjarvi
Excess Copper Predisposes Photosystem II to Photoinhibition in Vivo by Outcompeting Iron and Causing Decrease in Leaf Chlorophyll
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2002; 129(3): 1359 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Havaux and K. K. Niyogi
The violaxanthin cycle protects plants from photooxidative damage by more than one mechanism
PNAS, July 20, 1999; 96(15): 8762 - 8767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. A. Logan and R. K. Monson
Thermotolerance of Leaf Discs from Four Isoprene-Emitting Species Is Not Enhanced by Exposure to Exogenous Isoprene
Plant Physiology, July 1, 1999; 120(3): 821 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Pätsikkä, E.-M. Aro, and E. Tyystjärvi
Increase in the Quantum Yield of Photoinhibition Contributes to Copper Toxicity in Vivo
Plant Physiology, June 1, 1998; 117(2): 619 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists