Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiTomaso, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiTomaso, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DiTomaso, J. M.

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY , Vol 102, Issue 4 1331-1336, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Plant Biologists


ENVIRONMENTAL AND STRESS PHYSIOLOGY

Membrane Response to Diclofop Acid Is pH Dependent and Is Regulated by the Protonated Form of the Herbicide in Roots of Pea and Resistant and Susceptible Rigid Ryegrass

J. M. DiTomaso
Department of Soil, Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Electrophysiological studies in roots of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) seedlings were conducted to elucidate the mechanism involved in the membrane response to the herbicide diclofop. In pea, a dicotyledonous plant insensitive to diclofop, membrane depolarization at varying pH values and herbicide concentrations increased at higher concentrations of the protonated form of diclofop acid (pKa 3.57). In unbuffered nutrient solution (pH 5.7), diclofop acid (50 [mu]M) depolarized the membrane potential (Em) in roots of both resistant and susceptible biotypes of rigid ryegrass, whereas recovery of Em occurred only in the resistant biotype following removal of the herbicide. This differential response was correlated with an increase (450%) in the rate of acidification of the external solution by the susceptible biotype, and the Em differences between biotypes were eliminated in solutions buffered at pH 5.0 or 6.0. In addition, p-chloromercuribenzene-sulfonic acid did not prevent the depolarization of Em by 50 [mu]M diclofop acid. It is concluded that the differential membrane response to diclofop acid in herbicide-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of rigid ryegrass is due to pH differences at the cell wall/plasmalemma interface. Although the membrane response is probably not involved in the primary inhibitory effect of diclofop on plant growth, it could reduce the concentration of the permeant protonated form of the herbicide and possibly could contribute to increased tolerance to diclofop and other weak acid herbicides.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Plant Biologists