Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, JKE.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, JKE.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, JKE.

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY , Vol 110, Issue 4 1309-1316, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Plant Biologists


WHOLE PLANT, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND STRESS PHYSIOLOGY

A Study of the Stationary Volumetric Elastic Modulus during Dehydration and Rehydration of Stems of Pea Seedlings

R. Murphy and JKE. Ortega
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bioengineering Laboratory, University of Colorado at Denver, Campus Box 112, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, Colorado 80217-3364

The relationship between cortical-cell turgor pressure (P) and tissue water mass (W) was determined for stem segments of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings subjected to hydration and dehydration. This allowed a test for elastic hysteresis in the cortical cells. The P-W curves for dehydration and hydration were not coincident. In some experiments, the P-W curves exhibited a "roll-off" at high P, similar to the "plateau effect" sometimes observed in pressure-chamber studies. When hydration was followed by a 4-h dehydration, the tissue water mass (W0) at minimum turgor was reduced. This might reflect a reduction in apoplastic water mass and/or a contraction of the symplast during dehydration. Neglecting the decrease in W0 leads to underestimates of the stationary volumetric elastic modulus ([epsilon]stat). The result of an analysis that assumes W0 was constant during hydration suggests that there was no significant difference in [epsilon]stat between dehydration and hydration and, hence, no significant elastic hysteresis. However, a 16-h dehydration increased [epsilon]stat; this might be a response to water stress.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Plant Biologists