Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pastenes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Horton, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pastenes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Horton, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pastenes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Horton, P.

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY , Vol 112, Issue 3 1253-1260, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Plant Biologists


WHOLE PLANT, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND STRESS PHYSIOLOGY

Effect of High Temperature on Photosynthesis in Beans (II. CO2 Assimilation and Metabolite Contents)

C. Pastenes and P. Horton
Robert Hill Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom

The effect of high temperatures on CO2 assimilation, metabolite content, and capacity for reducing power production in non-photorespiratory conditions has been assessed in two different bean (Phaseolus vulgarus L.) varieties, Blue Lake (commercially available in the United Kingdom) and Barbucho (a noncommercially bred Chilean variety), which are known to differ in their resistance to extreme high temperatures. Barbucho maintains its photosynthetic functions for a longer period of time under extreme heat compared with Blue Lake. The CO2 assimilation rate was increased by increases in temperature, with a decrease in ratio of rates of temperatures differing by 10[deg]C. It is suggested that limitations to CO2 assimilation are caused by metabolic restrictions that can be differentiated between those occurring in the range of 20 to 30[deg]C and 30 to 35[deg]C. It is likely that changes in the capacity for Calvin cycle regeneration and starch synthesis affect photosynthesis in the range of 20 to 30[deg]C. But following an increase in temperature from 30 to 35[deg]C, the supply of reducing power becomes limiting. From analysis of adenylate concentration, transthylakoid energization, and, indirectly, NADPH/NADP+ ratio, it was concluded that the limitation in the assimilatory power was due to an oxidation of the NADPH/NADP+ pool. In the range of 30 to 35[deg]C, the photosystem I quantum yield increased and photosystem II maintained its value. We conclude that the reorganization of thylakoids observed at 30 to 35[deg]C increased the excitation of photosystem I, inducing an increase in cyclic electron transport and a decrease in the supply of NADPH, limiting carbon assimilation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. D. Sharkey, A. E. Wiberley, and A. R. Donohue
Isoprene Emission from Plants: Why and How
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Y.-P. Cen and R. F. Sage
The Regulation of Rubisco Activity in Response to Variation in Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 Partial Pressure in Sweet Potato
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2005; 139(2): 979 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Kim and A. R. Portis Jr
Temperature Dependence of Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis Plants with Modifications in Rubisco Activase and Membrane Fluidity
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 522 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. H. Murchie, Y.-z. Chen, S. Hubbart, S. Peng, and P. Horton
Interactions between Senescence and Leaf Orientation Determine in Situ Patterns of Photosynthesis and Photoinhibition in Field-Grown Rice
Plant Physiology, February 1, 1999; 119(2): 553 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Plant Biologists