PLANT PHYSIOLOGY , Vol 114, Issue 4 1225-1236, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Plant Biologists

DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH REGULATION

Pea Mutants with Reduced Sensitivity to Far-Red Light Define an Important Role for Phytochrome A in Day-Length Detection

J. L. Weller, I. C. Murfet and J. B. Reid
Department of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, G.P.O. Box 252-55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (J.L.W., I.C.M., J.B.R.)

In garden pea (Pisum sativum L.), a long-day plant, long photoperiods promote flowering by reducing the synthesis or transport of a graft-transmissible inhibitor of flowering. Previous physiological studies have indicated that this promotive effect is predominantly achieved through a response that requires long exposures to light and for which far-red (FR) light is the most effective. These characteristics implicate the action of phytochrome A (phyA). To investigate this matter further, we screened ethylmethane sulfonate-mutagenized pea seedlings for FR-unresponsive, potentially phyA-deficient mutants. Two allelic, recessive mutants were isolated and were designated fun1 for FR unresponsive. The fun1-1 mutant is specifically deficient in the PHYA apoprotein and has a seedling phenotype indistinguishable from wild type when grown under white light. However, fun1-1 plants grown to maturity under long photoperiods show a highly pleiotropic phenotype, with short internodes, thickened stems, delayed flowering and senescence, longer peduncles, and higher seed yield. This phenotype results in large part from an inability of fun1-1 to detect day extensions. These results establish a crucial role for phyA in the control of flowering in pea, and show that phyA mediates responses to both red and FR light. Furthermore, grafting and epistasis studies with fun1 and dne, a mutant deficient in the floral inhibitor, show that the roles of phyA in seedling deetiolation and in day-length detection are genetically separable and that the phyA-mediated promotion of flowering results from a reduction in the synthesis or transport of the floral inhibitor.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Watanabe, R. Hideshima, Z. Xia, Y. Tsubokura, S. Sato, Y. Nakamoto, N. Yamanaka, R. Takahashi, M. Ishimoto, T. Anai, et al. Map-Based Cloning of the Gene Associated With the Soybean Maturity Locus E3 Genetics, August 1, 2009; 182(4): 1251 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Weller, V. Hecht, J. K. Vander Schoor, S. E. Davidson, and J. J. Ross Light Regulation of Gibberellin Biosynthesis in Pea Is Mediated through the COP1/HY5 Pathway PLANT CELL, March 1, 2009; 21(3): 800 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Wollenberg, B. Strasser, P. D. Cerdan, and R. M. Amasino Acceleration of Flowering during Shade Avoidance in Arabidopsis Alters the Balance between FLOWERING LOCUS C-Mediated Repression and Photoperiodic Induction of Flowering Plant Physiology, November 1, 2008; 148(3): 1681 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Liu, A. Kanazawa, H. Matsumura, R. Takahashi, K. Harada, and J. Abe Genetic Redundancy in Soybean Photoresponses Associated With Duplication of the Phytochrome A Gene Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 995 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Hecht, C. L. Knowles, J. K. Vander Schoor, L. C. Liew, S. E. Jones, M. J.M. Lambert, and J. L. Weller Pea LATE BLOOMER1 Is a GIGANTEA Ortholog with Roles in Photoperiodic Flowering, Deetiolation, and Transcriptional Regulation of Circadian Clock Gene Homologs Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 648 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Takano, N. Inagaki, X. Xie, N. Yuzurihara, F. Hihara, T. Ishizuka, M. Yano, M. Nishimura, A. Miyao, H. Hirochika, et al. Distinct and Cooperative Functions of Phytochromes A, B, and C in the Control of Deetiolation and Flowering in Rice PLANT CELL, December 1, 2005; 17(12): 3311 - 3325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Platten, E. Foo, R. C. Elliott, V. Hecht, J. B. Reid, and J. L. Weller Cryptochrome 1 Contributes to Blue-Light Sensing in Pea Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1472 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Weller, S. L. Batge, J. J. Smith, L. H. J. Kerckhoffs, V. A. Sineshchekov, I. C. Murfet, and J. B. Reid A Dominant Mutation in the Pea PHYA Gene Confers Enhanced Responses to Light and Impairs the Light-Dependent Degradation of Phytochrome A Plant Physiology, August 1, 2004; 135(4): 2186 - 2195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Davidson, J. J. Smith, C. A. Helliwell, A. T. Poole, and J. B. Reid The Pea Gene LH Encodes ent-Kaurene Oxidase Plant Physiology, March 1, 2004; 134(3): 1123 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. El-Din El-Assal, C. Alonso-Blanco, A. J.M. Peeters, C. Wagemaker, J. L. Weller, and M. Koornneef The Role of Cryptochrome 2 in Flowering in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1504 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Markelz, D. E. Costich, and T. P. Brutnell Photomorphogenic Responses in Maize Seedling Development Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1578 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. R. Cober and D. F. Curtis Both Promoters and Inhibitors Affected Flowering Time in Grafted Soybean Flowering-Time Isolines Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Beveridge, J. L. Weller, S. R. Singer, and J. M.I. Hofer Axillary Meristem Development. Budding Relationships between Networks Controlling Flowering, Branching, and Photoperiod Responsiveness Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 927 - 934. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Sharrock and T. Clack Patterns of Expression and Normalized Levels of the Five Arabidopsis Phytochromes Plant Physiology, September 1, 2002; 130(1): 442 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hayama, T. Izawa, and K. Shimamoto Isolation of Rice Genes Possibly Involved in the Photoperiodic Control of Flowering by a Fluorescent Differential Display Method Plant Cell Physiol., May 15, 2002; 43(5): 494 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Reid, N. A. Botwright, J. J. Smith, D. P. O'Neill, and L. H. J. Kerckhoffs Control of Gibberellin Levels and Gene Expression during De-Etiolation in Pea Plant Physiology, February 1, 2002; 128(2): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Reeves, G. Murtas, S. Dash, and G. Coupland early in short days 4, a mutation in Arabidopsis that causes early flowering and reduces the mRNA abundance of the floral repressor FLC Development, January 12, 2002; 129(23): 5349 - 5361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hisada, T. Yoshida, S. Kubota, N. K. Nishizawa, and M. Furuya Technical Advance: An Automated Device for Cryofixation of Specimens of Electron Microscopy using Liquid Helium Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2001; 42(9): 885 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Long and M. Iino Light-Dependent Osmoregulation in Pea Stem Protoplasts. Photoreceptors, Tissue Specificity, Ion Relationships, and Physiological Implications Plant Physiology, April 1, 2001; 125(4): 1854 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Takano, H. Kanegae, T. Shinomura, A. Miyao, H. Hirochika, and M. Furuya Isolation and Characterization of Rice Phytochrome A Mutants PLANT CELL, March 1, 2001; 13(3): 521 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Hisada, H. Hanzawa, J. L. Weller, A. Nagatani, J. B. Reid, and M. Furuya Light-Induced Nuclear Translocation of Endogenous Pea Phytochrome A Visualized by Immunocytochemical Procedures PLANT CELL, July 1, 2000; 12(7): 1063 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Lin Photoreceptors and Regulation of Flowering Time Plant Physiology, May 1, 2000; 123(1): 39 - 50. [Full Text]

				C.E. Carter, A. Szmidt-Jaworska, M. Hughes, B. Thomas, and S. Jackson Phytochrome regulation of phytochrome A mRNA levels in the model short-day-plant Pharbitis nil J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2000; 51(345): 703 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ait-Ali, S. Frances, J. L. Weller, J. B. Reid, R. E. Kendrick, and Y. Kamiya Regulation of Gibberellin 20-Oxidase and Gibberellin 3beta -Hydroxylase Transcript Accumulation during De-Etiolation of Pea Seedlings Plant Physiology, November 1, 1999; 121(3): 783 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Hanumappa, L. H. Pratt, M.-M. Cordonnier-Pratt, and G. F. Deitzer A Photoperiod-Insensitive Barley Line Contains a Light-Labile Phytochrome B Plant Physiology, March 1, 1999; 119(3): 1033 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. Mockler, H Guo, H Yang, H Duong, and C Lin Antagonistic actions of Arabidopsis cryptochromes and phytochrome B in the regulation of floral induction Development, January 5, 1999; 126(10): 2073 - 2082. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Somers, P. F. Devlin, and S. A. Kay Phytochromes and Cryptochromes in the Entrainment of the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock Science, November 20, 1998; 282(5393): 1488 - 1490. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. Inaba, Y. Nagano, J. B. Reid, and Y. Sasaki DE1, a 12-Base Pair cis-Regulatory Element Sufficient to Confer Dark-inducible and Light Down-regulated Expression to a Minimal Promoter in Pea J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2000; 275(26): 19723 - 19727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]