Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuelsen, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mok, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samuelsen, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mok, M. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Samuelsen, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mok, M. C.

Expression of the Yeast FRE Genes in Transgenic Tobacco

Andrew I. Samuelsen2, Ruth C. Martin, David W.S. Mok, and Machteld C. Mok*

Department of Horticulture and Center for Gene Research and Biotechnology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-7304

Two yeast genes, FRE1 and FRE2 (encoding Fe(III) reductases) were placed under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and introduced into tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Homozygous lines containing FRE1, FRE2, or FRE1 plus FRE2 were generated. Northern-blot analyses revealed mRNA of two different sizes in FRE1 lines, whereas all FRE2 lines had mRNA only of the expected length. Fe(III) reduction, chlorophyll contents, and Fe levels were determined in transgenic and control plants under Fe-sufficient and Fe-deficient conditions. In a normal growth environment, the highest root Fe(III) reduction, 4-fold higher than in controls, occurred in the double transformant (FRE1 + FRE2). Elevated Fe(III) reduction was also observed in all FRE2 and some FRE1 lines. The increased Fe(III) reduction occurred along the entire length of the roots and on shoot sections. FRE2 and double transformants were more tolerant to Fe deficiency in hydroponic culture, as shown by higher chlorophyll and Fe concentrations in younger leaves, whereas FRE1 transformants did not differ from the controls. Overall, the beneficial effects of FRE2 were consistent, suggesting that FRE2 may be used to improve Fe efficiency in crop plants.


2   Present address: Biology Department, Albright College, Reading, PA 19612.
*   Corresponding author; e-mail mokm{at}bcc.orst.edu; fax 1-541-737-3479.

Plant Physiol. (1998) 118: 51-58
Copyright Clearance Center:   0032-0889/98/118//08
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. D. Lindblom, S. Abdel-Ghany, B. R. Hanson, S. Hwang, N. Terry, and E. A. H. Pilon-Smits
Constitutive Expression of a High-Affinity Sulfate Transporter in Indian Mustard Affects Metal Tolerance and Accumulation
J. Environ. Qual., April 3, 2006; 35(3): 726 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. L. Wangeline, J. L. Burkhead, K. L. Hale, S. D. Lindblom, N. Terry, M. Pilon, and E. A. H. Pilon-Smits
Overexpression of ATP Sulfurylase in Indian Mustard: Effects on Tolerance and Accumulation of Twelve Metals
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 54 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. E. Bennett, J. L. Burkhead, K. L. Hale, N. Terry, M. Pilon, and E. A. H. Pilon-Smits
Analysis of Transgenic Indian Mustard Plants for Phytoremediation of Metal-Contaminated Mine Tailings
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 432 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. A. Grusak
Enhancing Mineral Content in Plant Food Products
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 21(90003): 178S - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Plant Biologists