Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pouteau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pouteau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pouteau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N.

Quantitative Control of Inflorescence Formation in Impatiens balsamina1

Sylvie Pouteau2, *, Fiona Tooke, and Nicholas Battey

Department of Horticulture, Plant Science Laboratories, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AS, United Kingdom

We analyzed the process of inflorescence formation in Impatiens balsamina by studying the architecture of the plant under different photoperiod treatments. Floral reversion under noninductive conditions in this species is caused by the lack of persistence of the induced state in the leaf. This can be used to control the amount of inductive signal and to examine its quantitative influence on morphological changes in the plant. The floral transition was characterized by a continuum of variation at the level of meristem identity, primordium initiation, and floral organ identity. This continuum was enhanced during reversion, suggesting that the establishment of a continuum partly reflects limiting amounts of inductive signal exported from the leaf to the meristem. The transcription patterns of two homologs of genes involved in the control of floral meristem identity, Imp-FLO and Imp-FIM, were similar in terminal and axillary flowers and may be associated with the continuum exhibited by I. balsamina. By analyzing the fate of axillary meristem primordia initiated before and after the beginning of the inductive period, we showed that de novo initiation of axillary meristem primordia by the evoked meristem is not required and that primordia initiated before evocation can adopt different fates, depending on the amount of inductive signal. The influence of age and/or position on primordium responsiveness to the inductive signal is discussed.


1   This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council Cell Molecular Biology Initiative (grant no. AT45/559 to F.T.). S.P. was supported by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Versailles, France.
2   Present address: Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Route de Saint-Cyr, F78026 Versailles cedex, France.
*   Corresponding author; e-mail pouteau{at}versailles.inra.fr; fax 33-1-30-83-30-99.

Plant Physiol. (1998) 118: 1191-1201
Copyright Clearance Center:   0032-0889/98/118//11
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Pouteau and C. Albertini
The significance of bolting and floral transitions as indicators of reproductive phase change in Arabidopsis
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2009; 60(12): 3367 - 3377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Wang, J. Chen, J. Wen, M. Tadege, G. Li, Y. Liu, K. S. Mysore, P. Ratet, and R. Chen
Control of Compound Leaf Development by FLORICAULA/LEAFY Ortholog SINGLE LEAFLET1 in Medicago truncatula
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1759 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
R. Benlloch, A. Berbel, A. Serrano-Mislata, and F. Madueno
Floral Initiation and Inflorescence Architecture: A Comparative View
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 659 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Pouteau, V. Ferret, and D. Lefebvre
Comparison of environmental and mutational variation in flowering time in Arabidopsis
J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2006; 57(15): 4099 - 4109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. Tooke, M. Ordidge, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey
Mechanisms and function of flower and inflorescence reversion
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2005; 56(420): 2587 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C.-N. Wang and Q. C. B. Cronk
Meristem fate and bulbil formation in Titanotrichum (Gesneriaceae)
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2003; 90(12): 1696 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
F. Parcy, K. Bomblies, and D. Weigel
Interaction of LEAFY, AGAMOUS and TERMINAL FLOWER1 in maintaining floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis
Development, March 7, 2003; 129(10): 2519 - 2527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. Ampomah-Dwamena, B. A. Morris, P. Sutherland, B. Veit, and J.-L. Yao
Down-Regulation of TM29, a Tomato SEPALLATA Homolog, Causes Parthenocarpic Fruit Development and Floral Reversion
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2002; 130(2): 605 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
F. Tooke and N. H. Battey
A Leaf-Derived Signal Is a Quantitative Determinant of Floral Form in Impatiens
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2000; 12(10): 1837 - 1848.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. J. Orkwiszewski and R. S. Poethig
Phase identity of the maize leaf is determined after leaf initiation
PNAS, September 5, 2000; (2000) 180301597.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. J. Orkwiszewski and R. S. Poethig
Phase identity of the maize leaf is determined after leaf initiation
PNAS, September 12, 2000; 97(19): 10631 - 10636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Plant Biologists