|
|
||||||||
|
Evidence for a Slow-Turnover Form of the Ca2+-Independent Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Kinase in the Aleurone-Endosperm Tissue of Germinating Barley Seeds1
Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de
Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Reina Mercedes no. 6, 41012 Sevilla, Spain (L.O., R.A., C.E.); Instituto de
Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Centro de
Investigaciones Científicas "Isla de la Cartuja," Avda
Américo Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain (M.-C.G., F.J.C.); and Institut de Biotechnologie des Plantes, Unité Associée
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, D 1128, Bâtiment 630, Université de Paris-Sud, Centre d Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) activity was detected in aleurone-endosperm extracts of barley (Hordeum vulgare) seeds during germination, and specific anti-sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) C4 PEPC polyclonal antibodies immunodecorated constitutive 103-kD and inducible 108-kD PEPC polypeptides in western analysis. The 103- and 108-kD polypeptides were radiolabeled in situ after imbibition for up to 1.5 d in 32P-labeled inorganic phosphate. In vitro phosphorylation by a Ca2+-independent PEPC protein kinase (PK) in crude extracts enhanced the enzyme's velocity and decreased its sensitivity to L-malate at suboptimal pH and [PEP]. Isolated aleurone cell protoplasts contained both phosphorylated PEPC and a Ca2+-independent PEPC-PK that was partially purified by affinity chromatography on blue dextran-agarose. This PK activity was present in dry seeds, and PEPC phosphorylation in situ during imbibition was not affected by the cytosolic protein-synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, by weak acids, or by various pharmacological reagents that had proven to be effective blockers of the light signal transduction chain and PEPC phosphorylation in C4 mesophyll protoplasts. These collective data support the hypothesis that this Ca2+-independent PEPC-PK was formed during maturation of barley seeds and that its presumed underlying signaling elements were no longer operative during germination. 1 This research was supported by grants from the Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica (no. PB 92-0675), the Dirección General de Ensenan za Superior e Investigacion Científica (no. B1097-1205-C02-02), and the Acción Integrada Hispano-Francesa (no. HF96-0200), and by the Grupo de Investigación de Fisiología Vegetal from La Junta de Andalucía. This work was also partially supported by the Rhone-Poulenc Agro S.A., Torre de la Reina, Sevilla, Spain. * Corresponding author; e-mail echeva{at}cica.es; fax 34-95-461-5780.
Plant Physiol. (1999) 119: 511-520
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|