Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, J. C.

Plant Physiol, October 2000, Vol. 124, pp. 499-506

Plant Signaling 2000. Cross Talk Among Geneticists, Physiologists, and Ecologists1

Daniel J. Cosgrove,* Simon Gilroy, Teh-hui Kao, Hong Ma, and Jack C. Schultz

Departments of Biology (D.J.C., S.G., H.M.), Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (T.K.), and Entomology (J.C.S.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Plants respond in complex ways to their environment, to their internal physiological status, and to the activity of other plants, pathogens, herbivores, and organisms. Plant Signaling 2000, a symposium sponsored by the Penn State Intercollege Graduate Program in Plant Physiology (May 18-20, 2000), explored the machinery underlying these responses and their potential for cross talk. We recount here some of the major themes emerging from this interdisciplinary symposium, which ranged from genetic and biochemical analyses of signaling pathways in Arabidopsis and other model plants to field studies of plants responding to insect damage.


1 This symposium was supported by National Science Foundation Training Grants (grant nos. DGE-9354969 and DBI-9413294) and by Pennsylvania State University.

* Corresponding author; e-mail dcosgrove{at}psu.edu; fax 814-865-9131.

© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
H. S. Chae, F. Faure, and J. J. Kieber
The eto1, eto2, and eto3 Mutations and Cytokinin Treatment Increase Ethylene Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by Increasing the Stability of ACS Protein
PLANT CELL, February 1, 2003; 15(2): 545 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Alexander and D. Grierson
Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2002; 53(377): 2039 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. C. Schultz
Shared Signals and the Potential for Phylogenetic Espionage Between Plants and Animals
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2002; 42(3): 454 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Tatsuki and H. Mori
Phosphorylation of Tomato 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic Acid Synthase, LE-ACS2, at the C-terminal Region
J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 28051 - 28057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Plant Biologists