Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felix, G.
Right arrow Articles by Boller, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felix, G.
Right arrow Articles by Boller, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Felix, G.
Right arrow Articles by Boller, T.

Plant Physiol, November 2000, Vol. 124, pp. 1169-1180

Sensing of Osmotic Pressure Changes in Tomato Cells

Georg Felix,* Martin Regenass, and Thomas Boller

Friedrich Miescher-Institute, P.O. Box 2543, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland

Cells of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) growing in suspension gradually depleted their culture medium and caused a steady decrease in its osmolality. When confronted with a sudden change in medium osmolality (a hypo-osmotic or hyperosmotic shock), respectively, these cells responded with volume changes and stress symptoms such as rapid extracellular alkalinization, efflux of K+-ions, and induction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase acid, the key enzyme of ethylene biosynthesis. This array of stress symptoms is well known from cultured plant cells treated with microbial elicitors. Compared with elicitor treatment, induction of responses by hyperosmotic shock was slow and occurred only after increases of approximately 200,000 Pa in osmotic pressure. In contrast, hypo-osmotic shock induced responses without measurable lag and faster than elicitor treatments. Measurable medium alkalinization was induced when medium osmolality was reduced by as little as approximately 10 mosmol, a change corresponding to only approximately 0.2 bar in osmotic pressure. Like treatment with elicitors, hypo-osmotic shock induced specific changes in protein phosphorylations as demonstrated by in vivo labeling with [33P]orthophosphate. Exposure of cells to consecutive up- and down-shifts in medium osmolality showed that sensing of osmotic changes occurred within seconds, whereas adaptation to new osmotic conditions proceeded over hours. In conclusion, suspension-cultured plant cells display rapid, easily measurable macroscopic responses to osmotic shock and provide an interesting model system to study osmoregulation, a key process in plant growth and development.


* Corresponding author; e-mail felix{at}fmi.ch; fax 41-61-697-4527.

© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
B. O. R. Bargmann, A. M. Laxalt, B. t. Riet, B. van Schooten, E. Merquiol, C. Testerink, M. A. Haring, D. Bartels, and T. Munnik
Multiple PLDs Required for High Salinity and Water Deficit Tolerance in Plants
Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 78 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Testerink, P. B. Larsen, D. van der Does, J. A. J. van Himbergen, and T. Munnik
Phosphatidic acid binds to and inhibits the activity of Arabidopsis CTR1
J. Exp. Bot., November 13, 2007; (2007) erm243v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Tirajoh, T. S. T. Aung, A. B. McKay, and A. L. Plant
Stress-responsive {alpha}-dioxygenase expression in tomato roots
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2005; 56(412): 713 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
Y. Liu and S. Zhang
Phosphorylation of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid Synthase by MPK6, a Stress-Responsive Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, Induces Ethylene Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2004; 16(12): 3386 - 3399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C. R. Jeter, W. Tang, E. Henaff, T. Butterfield, and S. J. Roux
Evidence of a Novel Cell Signaling Role for Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphates and Diphosphates in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2004; 16(10): 2652 - 2664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
L. Zonia and T. Munnik
Osmotically Induced Cell Swelling versus Cell Shrinking Elicits Specific Changes in Phospholipid Signals in Tobacco Pollen Tubes
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2004; 134(2): 813 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C. Y. Kim, Y. Liu, E. T. Thorne, H. Yang, H. Fukushige, W. Gassmann, D. Hildebrand, R. E. Sharp, and S. Zhang
Activation of a Stress-Responsive Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade Induces the Biosynthesis of Ethylene in Plants
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2003; 15(11): 2707 - 2718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. R. Holley, R. D. Yalamanchili, D. S. Moura, C. A. Ryan, and J. W. Stratmann
Convergence of Signaling Pathways Induced by Systemin, Oligosaccharide Elicitors, and Ultraviolet-B Radiation at the Level of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Lycopersicon peruvianum Suspension-Cultured Cells
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2003; 132(4): 1728 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Haruta and C. P. Constabel
Rapid Alkalinization Factors in Poplar Cell Cultures. Peptide Isolation, cDNA Cloning, and Differential Expression in Leaves and Methyl Jasmonate-Treated Cells
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2003; 131(2): 814 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
W. Liu, D. J. Fairbairn, R. J. Reid, and D. P. Schachtman
Characterization of Two HKT1 Homologues from Eucalyptus camaldulensis That Display Intrinsic Osmosensing Capability
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2001; 127(1): 283 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Plant Biologists