Plant Physiol. EPICENTRE Biotechnologies
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hadwiger, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hadwiger, L. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hadwiger, L. A.

Plant Physiol, February 2001, Vol. 125, pp. 752-762

A Comparison of the Effects of DNA-Damaging Agents and Biotic Elicitors on the Induction of Plant Defense Genes, Nuclear Distortion, and Cell Death1

Jane Junghae Choi, Steven J. Klosterman, and Lee A. Hadwiger*

Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6430

Pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Alcan) endocarp tissue challenged with an incompatible fungal pathogen, Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli or fungal elicitors results in the induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and the accumulation of pisatin, a phytoalexin. Essentially the same response occurs in pea tissue exposed to DNA-specific agents that crosslink or intercalate DNA. In this study, the effects of DNA-damaging agents were assessed relative to the inducible expression of several pea PR genes: phenylalanine ammonia lyase, chalcone synthase, and DRR206. Mitomycin C and actinomycin D mimicked the biotic elicitors in enhancing the expression of all three PR genes. The activities of these PR gene promoters, isolated from different plants, were evaluated heterologously in transgenic tobacco. It is remarkable that beta -glucuronidase expression was induced when plants containing the heterologous phenylalanine ammonia lyase, chalcone synthase, and DRR206 promoter-beta -glucuronidase chimeric reporter genes were treated by DNA-damaging agents. Finally, cytological analyses indicated that many of these agents caused nuclear distortion and collapse of the treated pea cells. Yet we observed that cell death is not necessary for the induction of the PR gene promoters assessed in this study. Based on these observations and previously published results, we propose that DNA damage or the associated alteration of chromatin can signal the transcriptional activation of plant defense genes.

1 This work was supported by the Washington Sea Grant Program (grant no. R/B-26) and the Washington Potato Commission.

* Corresponding author; e-mail chitosan{at}mail.wsu.edu; fax 509-335-9581.

© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. Salerno, A. Napoli, M. F. White, M. Rossi, and M. Ciaramella
Transcriptional response to DNA damage in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus
Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2003; 31(21): 6127 - 6138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Ceccherini, J. Pote, E. Kay, V. T. Van, J. Marechal, G. Pietramellara, P. Nannipieri, T. M. Vogel, and P. Simonet
Degradation and Transformability of DNA from Transgenic Leaves
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 69(1): 673 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Plant Biologists