Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jander, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ausubel, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jander, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ausubel, F. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jander, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ausubel, F. M.

Plant Physiol, June 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 890-898

The TASTY Locus on Chromosome 1 of Arabidopsis Affects Feeding of the Insect Herbivore Trichoplusia ni1

Georg Jander,2 Jianping Cui, Betty Nhan, Naomi E. Pierce, and Frederick M. Ausubel*

Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (G.J., F.M.A.); and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (J.C., B.N., N.E.P.)

The generalist insect herbivore Trichoplusia ni (cabbage looper) readily consumes Arabidopsis and can complete its entire life cycle on this plant. Natural isolates (ecotypes) of Arabidopsis are not equally susceptible to T. ni feeding. While some are hardly touched by T. ni, others are eaten completely to the ground. Comparison of two commonly studied Arabidopsis ecotypes in choice experiments showed that Columbia is considerably more resistant than Landsberg erecta. In no-choice experiments, where larvae were confined on one or the other ecotype, weight gain was more rapid on Landsberg erecta than on Columbia. Genetic mapping of this difference in insect susceptibility using recombinant inbred lines resulted in the discovery of the TASTY locus near 85 cM on chromosome 1 of Arabidopsis. The resistant allele of this locus is in the Columbia ecotype, and an F1 hybrid has a sensitive phenotype that is similar to that of Landsberg erecta. The TASTY locus is distinct from known genetic differences between Columbia and Landsberg erecta that affect glucosinolate content, trichome density, disease resistance, and flowering time.


1 This work was supported by a National Research Service Award (no. GM18735 to G.J.) and by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. GM48707 to F.M.A.).

2 Present address: Cereon Genomics, 45 Sidney Street, Cambridge, MA 02139.

* Corresponding author; e-mail ausubel{at}frodo.mgh.harvard.edu; fax 617-726-5949.

© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. M. Wentzell and D. J. Kliebenstein
Genotype, Age, Tissue, and Environment Regulate the Structural Outcome of Glucosinolate Activation
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2008; 147(1): 415 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. de Vos, K. L. Kriksunov, and G. Jander
Indole-3-Acetonitrile Production from Indole Glucosinolates Deters Oviposition by Pieris rapae
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 916 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
Z. Zhang, J. A. Ober, and D. J. Kliebenstein
The Gene Controlling the Quantitative Trait Locus EPITHIOSPECIFIER MODIFIER1 Alters Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Insect Resistance in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, June 1, 2006; 18(6): 1524 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Duan, M.-Y. Huang, K. Palacio, and M. A. Schuler
Variations in CYP74B2 (Hydroperoxide Lyase) Gene Expression Differentially Affect Hexenal Signaling in the Columbia and Landsberg erecta Ecotypes of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1529 - 1544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. Komatsu, S. Okuda, M. Takahashi, R. Matsunaga, and Y. Nakazawa
QTL Mapping of Antibiosis Resistance to Common Cutworm (Spodoptera litura Fabricius) in Soybean
Crop Sci., August 26, 2005; 45(5): 2044 - 2048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
P. Reymond, N. Bodenhausen, R. M.P. Van Poecke, V. Krishnamurthy, M. Dicke, and E. E. Farmer
A Conserved Transcript Pattern in Response to a Specialist and a Generalist Herbivore
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2004; 16(11): 3132 - 3147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Cui, G. Jander, L. R. Racki, P. D. Kim, N. E. Pierce, and F. M. Ausubel
Signals Involved in Arabidopsis Resistance to Trichoplusia ni Caterpillars Induced by Virulent and Avirulent Strains of the Phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2002; 129(2): 551 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Kliebenstein, D. Pedersen, B. Barker, and T. Mitchell-Olds
Comparative Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci Controlling Glucosinolates, Myrosinase and Insect Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana
Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 325 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. A. Eckardt
Some Like It with Nitriles: A Nitrile-Specifying Protein Linked to Herbivore Feeding Behavior in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2001; 13(12): 2565 - 2568.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
V. Lambrix, M. Reichelt, T. Mitchell-Olds, D. J. Kliebenstein, and J. Gershenzon
The Arabidopsis Epithiospecifier Protein Promotes the Hydrolysis of Glucosinolates to Nitriles and Influences Trichoplusia ni Herbivory
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2001; 13(12): 2793 - 2807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. A. Eckardt, H.-T. Cho, R. M. Perrin, and M. R. Willmann
Plant Biology 2001
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2001; 13(10): 2165 - 2173.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Plant Biologists