Plant Physiol, August 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 1566-1578
Rapid Low Temperature-Induced Stomatal Closure Occurs in
Cold-Tolerant Commelina communis Leaves But Not in
Cold-Sensitive Tobacco Leaves, via a Mechanism That Involves Apoplastic
Calcium But Not Abscisic Acid1
Sally
Wilkinson,*
Alison Lee
Clephan, and
William John
Davies
Biological Sciences Department, Institute of Environmental and
Natural Sciences, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YQ,
United Kingdom
Commelina communis stomata closed within 1 h of
transferring intact plants from 27°C to 7°C, whereas tobacco
(Nicotiana rustica) stomata did not until the leaves
wilted. Abscisic acid (ABA) did not mediate cold-induced C.
communis stomatal closure: At low temperatures, bulk leaf ABA
did not increase; ABA did not preferentially accumulate in the
epidermis; its flux into detached leaves was lower; its release from
isolated epidermis was not greater; and stomata in epidermal strips
were less sensitive to exogenous ABA. Stomata of both species in
epidermal strips on large volumes of cold KCl failed to close unless
calcium was supplied. Therefore, the following cannot be triggers for
cold-induced stomatal closure in C. communis: direct
effects of temperature on guard or epidermal cells, long-distance
signals, and effects of temperature on photosynthesis. Low temperature
increased stomatal sensitivity to external CaCl2 by 50% in
C. communis but only by 20% in tobacco. C.
communis stomata were 300- to 1,000-fold more sensitive to
calcium at low temperature than tobacco stomata, but tobacco epidermis
only released 13.6-fold more calcium into bathing solutions than
C. communis. Stomata in C. communis
epidermis incubated on ever-decreasing volumes of cold calcium-free KCl
closed on the lowest volume (0.2 cm3) because the epidermal
apoplast contained enough calcium to mediate closure if this was not
over diluted. We propose that the basis of cold-induced stomatal
closure exhibited by intact C. communis leaves is
increased apoplastic calcium uptake by guard cells. Such responses do
not occur in chill-sensitive tobacco leaves.
1
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and
Biological Science Research Council, UK.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail sally.wilkinson{at}lancaster.ac.uk; fax
44-01524-843854.
© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists