|
Plant Physiol, September 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 58-66
Analysis of the Ethylene Response in the
epinastic Mutant of Tomato1
Cornelius S.
Barry,2
Elizabeth A.
Fox,2
Hsiao-ching
Yen,
Sanghyeob
Lee,
Tie-jin
Ying,
Donald
Grierson, and
James J.
Giovannoni*
Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Tower Road, Ithaca,
New York 14853 (C.S.B., E.A.F., J.J.G.); Department of Horticultural
Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2133
(H.-c.Y., S.L., J.J.G.); Plant Science Division, School of Biosciences,
University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12
5RD, United Kingdom (T.-j.Y., D.G.); and United States Department of
Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Plant, Soil, and Nutrition
Laboratory, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14853 (J.J.G.)
Ethylene can alter plant morphology due to its effect on cell
expansion. The most widely documented example of ethylene-mediated cell
expansion is promotion of the "triple response" of seedlings grown
in the dark in ethylene. Roots and hypocotyls become shorter and
thickened compared with controls due to a reorientation of cell
expansion, and curvature of the apical hook is more pronounced. The
epinastic (epi) mutant of tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum) has a dark-grown seedling
phenotype similar to the triple response even in the absence of
ethylene. In addition, in adult plants both the leaves and the petioles
display epinastic curvature and there is constitutive expression of an
ethylene-inducible chitinase gene. However, petal senescence and
abscission and fruit ripening are all normal in epi. A
double mutant
(epi/epi;Nr/Nr)
homozygous for both the recessive epi and dominant
ethylene-insensitive Never-ripe loci has the same
dark-grown seedling and vegetative phenotypes as epi but
possesses the senescence and ripening characteristics of
Never-ripe. These data suggest that a subset of ethylene
responses controlling vegetative growth and development may be
constitutively activated in epi. In addition, the
epi locus has been placed on the tomato RFLP map on the
long arm of chromosome 4 and does not demonstrate linkage to reported
tomato CTR1 homologs.
1
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation (grant nos. IBN-9604115 and DBI-9872617).
2
These authors contributed equally to the paper.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail jjg33{at}cornell.edu; fax
607-255-1132.
© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Lin, L. Arciga-Reyes, S. Zhong, L. Alexander, R. Hackett, I. Wilson, and D. Grierson
SlTPR1, a tomato tetratricopeptide repeat protein, interacts with the ethylene receptors NR and LeETR1, modulating ethylene and auxin responses and development
J. Exp. Bot.,
November 1, 2008;
59(15):
4271 - 4287.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kavroulakis, S. Ntougias, G. I. Zervakis, C. Ehaliotis, K. Haralampidis, and K. K. Papadopoulou
Role of ethylene in the protection of tomato plants against soil-borne fungal pathogens conferred by an endophytic Fusarium solani strain
J. Exp. Bot.,
November 29, 2007;
(2007)
erm230v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Barry, R. P. McQuinn, A. J. Thompson, G. B. Seymour, D. Grierson, and J. J. Giovannoni
Ethylene Insensitivity Conferred by the Green-ripe and Never-ripe 2 Ripening Mutants of Tomato
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2005;
138(1):
267 - 275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Diaz, A. ten Have, and J. A.L. van Kan
The Role of Ethylene and Wound Signaling in Resistance of Tomato to Botrytis cinerea
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2002;
129(3):
1341 - 1351.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L.-C. Wang, H. Li, and J. R. Ecker
Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling Networks
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2002;
14(90001):
S131 - 151.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|