Plant Physiol, March 2002, Vol. 128, pp. 1129-1136
Leaf Urea Metabolism in Potato. Urease Activity Profile and
Patterns of Recovery and Distribution of 15N after
Foliar Urea Application in Wild-Type and Urease-Antisense
Transgenics1
Claus-Peter
Witte,*
Sarah A.
Tiller,
Mark A.
Taylor, and
Howard V.
Davies
Unit of Plant Biochemistry, Scottish Crop Research Institute,
Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, United Kingdom
The influence of urease activity on N distribution and losses after
foliar urea application was investigated using wild-type and transgenic
potato (Solanum tuberosum cv Désirée) plants in which urease activity was down-regulated. A good correlation between
urease activity and 15N urea metabolism (NH3
accumulation) was found. The general accumulation of ammonium in leaves
treated with urea indicated that urease activity is not rate limiting,
at least initially, for the assimilation of urea N by the plant. It is
surprising that there was no effect of urease activity on either N
losses or 15N distribution in the plants after foliar urea
application. Experiments with wild-type plants in the field using
foliar-applied 15N urea demonstrated an initial rapid
export of N from urea-treated leaves to the tubers within 48 h,
followed by a more gradual redistribution during the subsequent days.
Only 10% to 18% of urea N applied was lost (presumably because of
NH3 volatilization) in contrast to far greater losses
reported in several other studies. The pattern of urease activity in
the canopy was investigated during plant development. The activity per
unit protein increased up to 10-fold with leaf and plant age,
suggesting a correlation with increased N recycling in senescing
tissues. Whereas several reports have claimed that plant urease is
inducible by urea, no evidence for urease induction could be found in potato.
1
This work was supported by the United Kingdom
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, by the European Commission
Training and Mobility of Researchers program, and by the
Scottish Executive Rural Affairs Department.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail cwitte{at}scri.sari.ac.uk; fax
44-1382-562426.
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists