Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online March 22, 2002; 10.1104/pp.010943

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1/235    most recent
pp.010943v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nikolopoulos, D.
Right arrow Articles by Karabourniotis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nikolopoulos, D.
Right arrow Articles by Karabourniotis, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nikolopoulos, D.
Right arrow Articles by Karabourniotis, G.

Plant Physiol, May 2002, Vol. 129, pp. 235-243

The Relationship between Anatomy and Photosynthetic Performance of Heterobaric Leaves1

Dimosthenis Nikolopoulos, Georgios Liakopoulos, Ioannis Drossopoulos, and George Karabourniotis*

Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Botanikos, Athens, Greece

Heterobaric leaves show heterogeneous pigmentation due to the occurrence of a network of transparent areas that are created from the bundle sheaths extensions (BSEs). Image analysis showed that the percentage of photosynthetically active leaf area (Ap) of the heterobaric leaves of 31 plant species was species dependent, ranging from 91% in Malva sylvestris to only 48% in Gynerium sp. Although a significant portion of the leaf surface does not correspond to photosynthetic tissue, the photosynthetic capacity of these leaves, expressed per unit of projected area (Pmax), was not considerably affected by the size of their transparent leaf area (At). This means that the photosynthetic capacity expressed per Ap (P*max) should increase with At. Moreover, the expression of P*max could be allowing the interpretation of the photosynthetic performance in relation to some critical anatomical traits. The P*max, irrespective of plant species, correlated with the specific leaf transparent volume (lambda t), as well as with the transparent leaf area complexity factor (CFAt), parameters indicating the volume per unit leaf area and length/density of the transparent tissues, respectively. Moreover, both parameters increased exponentially with leaf thickness, suggesting an essential functional role of BSEs mainly in thick leaves. The results of the present study suggest that although the Ap of an heterobaric leaf is reduced, the photosynthetic performance of each areole is increased, possibly due to the light transferring capacity of BSEs. This mechanism may allow a significant increase in leaf thickness and a consequent increase of the photosynthetic capacity per unit (projected) area, offering adaptive advantages in xerothermic environments.


1 This work was supported by the Greek Scholarship Foundation (postdoctoral scholarship to D.N.).

* Corresponding author; e-mail karab{at}aua.gr; fax 1-5294286.

© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. W. Horn, J. B. Fisher, P. B. Tomlinson, C. E. Lewis, and K. Laubengayer
Evolution of lamina anatomy in the palm family (Arecaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1462 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. Liakoura, M. N. Fotelli, H. Rennenberg, and G. Karabourniotis
Should structure-function relations be considered separately for homobaric vs. heterobaric leaves?
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2009; 96(3): 612 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. J. Reidel, E. A. Rennie, V. Amiard, L. Cheng, and R. Turgeon
Phloem Loading Strategies in Three Plant Species That Transport Sugar Alcohols
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2009; 149(3): 1601 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. C. Leegood
Roles of the bundle sheath cells in leaves of C3 plants
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1663 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. I.L. Morison, T. Lawson, and G. Cornic
Lateral CO2 Diffusion inside Dicotyledonous Leaves Can Be Substantial: Quantification in Different Light Intensities
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2007; 145(3): 680 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
T. Kenzo, T. Ichie, Y. Watanabe, and T. Hiromi
Ecological distribution of homobaric and heterobaric leaves in tree species of Malaysian lowland tropical rainforest
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2007; 94(5): 764 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Plant Biologists