Plant Physiol, May 2002, Vol. 129, pp. 235-243
The Relationship between Anatomy and Photosynthetic Performance
of Heterobaric Leaves1
Dimosthenis
Nikolopoulos,
Georgios
Liakopoulos,
Ioannis
Drossopoulos, and
George
Karabourniotis*
Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Agricultural
Biotechnology, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Botanikos, Athens, Greece
Heterobaric leaves show heterogeneous pigmentation due to
the occurrence of a network of transparent areas that are created from
the bundle sheaths extensions (BSEs). Image analysis showed that the
percentage of photosynthetically active leaf area (Ap) of
the heterobaric leaves of 31 plant species was species dependent, ranging from 91% in Malva sylvestris to only 48% in
Gynerium sp. Although a significant portion of the leaf
surface does not correspond to photosynthetic tissue, the
photosynthetic capacity of these leaves, expressed per unit of
projected area (Pmax), was not considerably affected by the
size of their transparent leaf area (At). This means that
the photosynthetic capacity expressed per Ap
(P*max) should increase with At. Moreover,
the expression of P*max could be allowing the
interpretation of the photosynthetic performance in relation to some
critical anatomical traits. The P*max, irrespective of
plant species, correlated with the specific leaf transparent volume
(
t), as well as with the transparent leaf area
complexity factor (CFAt), parameters indicating
the volume per unit leaf area and length/density of the transparent
tissues, respectively. Moreover, both parameters increased
exponentially with leaf thickness, suggesting an essential functional
role of BSEs mainly in thick leaves. The results of the present study
suggest that although the Ap of an heterobaric leaf is
reduced, the photosynthetic performance of each areole is increased,
possibly due to the light transferring capacity of BSEs. This mechanism
may allow a significant increase in leaf thickness and a consequent
increase of the photosynthetic capacity per unit (projected) area,
offering adaptive advantages in xerothermic environments.
1
This work was supported by the Greek Scholarship
Foundation (postdoctoral scholarship to D.N.).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail karab{at}aua.gr; fax 1-5294286.
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists