Plant Physiol. EPICENTRE Biotechnologies
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online January 23, 2003; 10.1104/pp.014365

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
131/2/568    most recent
pp.014365v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Setter, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Setter, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yu, L.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Setter, T. L.

Plant Physiol, February 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 568-582

Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Placenta and Endosperm in Developing Maize Kernels in Response to Water Deficit1

Long-Xi Yu and Tim L. Setter*

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

The early post-pollination phase of maize (Zea mays) development is particularly sensitive to water deficit stress. Using cDNA microarray, we studied transcriptional profiles of endosperm and placenta/pedicel tissues in developing maize kernels under water stress. At 9 d after pollination (DAP), placenta/pedicel and endosperm differed considerably in their transcriptional responses. In placenta/pedicel, 79 genes were significantly affected by stress and of these 89% were up-regulated, whereas in endosperm, 56 genes were significantly affected and 82% of these were down-regulated. Only nine of the stress-regulated genes were in common between these tissues. Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that different sets of genes were regulated in the two tissues. After rewatering at 9 DAP, profiles at 12 DAP suggested that two regulons exist, one for genes responding specifically to concurrent imposition of stress, and another for genes remaining affected after transient stress. In placenta, genes encoding recognized stress tolerance proteins, including heat shock proteins, chaperonins, and major intrinsic proteins, were the largest class of genes regulated, all of which were up-regulated. In contrast, in endosperm, genes in the cell division and growth category represented a large class of down-regulated genes. Several cell wall-degrading enzymes were expressed at lower levels than in controls, suggesting that stress delayed normal advance to programmed cell death in the central endosperm. We suggest that the responsiveness of placenta to whole-plant stress factors (water potential, abscisic acid, and sugar flux) and of endosperm to indirect factors may play key roles in determining the threshold for kernel abortion.


1 This work was supported by the National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (grant no. 00-35100-9279).

* Corresponding author; e-mail TLS1{at}cornell.edu; fax 607-255-2644.

© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Tuberosa, S. Salvi, S. Giuliani, M. C. Sanguineti, M. Bellotti, S. Conti, and P. Landi
Genome-wide Approaches to Investigate and Improve Maize Response to Drought
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-120 - S-141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Boyer and J. E. McLaughlin
Functional reversion to identify controlling genes in multigenic responses: analysis of floral abortion
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 267 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
L. Xiong, R.-G. Wang, G. Mao, and J. M. Koczan
Identification of Drought Tolerance Determinants by Genetic Analysis of Root Response to Drought Stress and Abscisic Acid
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1065 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. E. McLAUGHLIN and J. S. BOYER
Sugar-responsive Gene Expression, Invertase Activity, and Senescence in Aborting Maize Ovaries at Low Water Potentials
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2004; 94(5): 675 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Boyer and M. E. Westgate
Grain yields with limited water
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2385 - 2394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Melkonian, L.-X. Yu, and T. L. Setter
Chilling responses of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings: root hydraulic conductance, abscisic acid, and stomatal conductance
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(403): 1751 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists