Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online March 6, 2003; 10.1104/pp.102.003616

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
131/4/1748    most recent
pp.102.003616v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (58)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abebe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cushman, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abebe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cushman, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abebe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cushman, J. C.

Plant Physiol, April 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 1748-1755

Tolerance of Mannitol-Accumulating Transgenic Wheat to Water Stress and Salinity1

Tilahun Abebe,2 Arron C. Guenzi,* Bjorn Martin, and John C. Cushman3

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences (T.A., A.C.G., B.M.) and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (J.C.C.), Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078

Previous work with model transgenic plants has demonstrated that cellular accumulation of mannitol can alleviate abiotic stress. Here, we show that ectopic expression of the mtlD gene for the biosynthesis of mannitol in wheat improves tolerance to water stress and salinity. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Bobwhite) was transformed with the mtlD gene of Escherichia coli. Tolerance to water stress and salinity was evaluated using calli and T2 plants transformed with (+mtlD) or without (-mtlD) mtlD. Calli were exposed to -1.0 MPa of polyethylene glycol 8,000 or 100 mM NaCl. T2 plants were stressed by withholding water or by adding 150 mM NaCl to the nutrient medium. Fresh weight of -mtlD calli was reduced by 40% in the presence of polyethylene glycol and 37% under NaCl stress. Growth of +mtlD calli was not affected by stress. In -mtlD plants, fresh weight, dry weight, plant height, and flag leaf length were reduced by 70%, 56%, 40%, and 45% compared with 40%, 8%, 18%, and 29%, respectively, in +mtlD plants. Salt stress reduced shoot fresh weight, dry weight, plant height, and flag leaf length by 77%, 73%, 25%, and 36% in -mtlD plants, respectively, compared with 50%, 30%, 12%, and 20% in +mtlD plants. However, the amount of mannitol accumulated in the callus and mature fifth leaf (1.7-3.7 µmol g-1 fresh weight in the callus and 0.6-2.0 µmol g-1 fresh weight in the leaf) was too small to protect against stress through osmotic adjustment. We conclude that the improved growth performance of mannitol-accumulating calli and mature leaves was due to other stress-protective functions of mannitol, although this study cannot rule out possible osmotic effects in growing regions of the plant.


1 This work was supported by the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, by the Oklahoma Wheat Research Foundation, by the National Science Foundation (grant no. EPS-9550478), by a scholarship from the Fulbright Foundation (to T.A.), and in part by the Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station (article no. 03031230).

2 Present address: Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

3 Present address: Department of Biochemistry/MS200, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.

* Corresponding author; e-mail acg{at}okstate.edu; fax 405-744-6039.

© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Guo, M. Baum, S. Grando, S. Ceccarelli, G. Bai, R. Li, M. von Korff, R. K. Varshney, A. Graner, and J. Valkoun
Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2009; 60(12): 3531 - 3544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Marzin, R. Mihaly, J. Pauk, and P. Schweizer
A transient assay system for the assessment of cell-autonomous gene function in dehydration-stressed barley
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2008; 59(12): 3359 - 3369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. P. Jauhar
Modern Biotechnology as an Integral Supplement to Conventional Plant Breeding: The Prospects and Challenges
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1841 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. F. Byrne
Safety and Public Acceptance of Transgenic Products
Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 113 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. F. Oraby, C. B. Ransom, A. N. Kravchenko, and M. B. Sticklen
Barley HVA1 Gene Confers Salt Tolerance in R3 Transgenic Oat
Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2218 - 2227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Yamada, H. Morishita, K. Urano, N. Shiozaki, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Shinozaki, and Y. Yoshiba
Effects of free proline accumulation in petunias under drought stress
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2005; 56(417): 1975 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Tester and A. Bacic
Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Grasses. From Model Plants to Crop Plants
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2005; 137(3): 791 - 793.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
V. Chinnusamy, A. Jagendorf, and J.-K. Zhu
Understanding and Improving Salt Tolerance in Plants
Crop Sci., January 31, 2005; 45(2): 437 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. M. Chaves and M. M. Oliveira
Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2365 - 2384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists