First published online March 20, 2003; 10.1104/pp.102.018135
Plant Physiol, April 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 1913-1920
Changes in Photoperiod or Temperature Alter the Functional
Relationships between Phytochromes and Reveal Roles for phyD and
phyE1
Karen J.
Halliday* and
Garry C.
Whitelam
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8
1UG, United Kingdom (K.J.H.); and Biology Department, University of
Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom (G.C.W.)
The phytochromes are one of the means via which plants obtain
information about their immediate environment and the changing seasons.
Phytochromes have important roles in developmental events such as the
switch to flowering, the timing of which can be crucial for the
reproductive success of the plant. Analysis of phyB
mutants has revealed that phyB plays a major role in this process. We have recently shown, however, that the flowering phenotype of the
phyB monogenic mutant is temperature dependent. A modest
reduction in temperature to 16°C was sufficient to abolish the
phyB mutant early-flowering phenotype present at 22°C.
Using mutants null for one or more phytochrome species, we have now
shown that phyA, phyD, and phyE, play greater roles with respect to
phyB in the control of flowering under cooler conditions. This change
in the relative contributions of individual phytochromes appears to be important for maintaining control of flowering in response to modest
alterations in ambient temperature. We demonstrate that changes in
ambient temperature or photoperiod can alter the hierarchy and/or the
functional relationships between phytochrome species. These experiments
reveal new roles for phyD and phyE and provide valuable insights into
how the phytochromes help to maintain development in the natural environment.
1
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and
Biological Science Research Council (UK).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail k.j.halliday{at}bristol.ac.uk; fax
44-117-925-7374.
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. van Zanten, L. A.C.J. Voesenek, A. J.M. Peeters, and F. F. Millenaar
Hormone- and Light-Mediated Regulation of Heat-Induced Differential Petiole Growth in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2009;
151(3):
1446 - 1458.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Franklin and P. H. Quail
Phytochrome functions in Arabidopsis development
J. Exp. Bot.,
October 8, 2009;
(2009)
erp304v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Zheng, D. Potter, and S. D. O'Neill
Phytochrome gene expression and phylogenetic analysis in the short-day plant Pharbitis nil (Convolvulaceae): Differential regulation by light and an endogenous clock
Am. J. Botany,
July 1, 2009;
96(7):
1319 - 1336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ikeda, N. Fujii, and H. Setoguchi
Molecular Evolution of Phytochromes in Cardamine nipponica (Brassicaceae) Suggests the Involvement of PHYE in Local Adaptation
Genetics,
June 1, 2009;
182(2):
603 - 614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Clack, A. Shokry, M. Moffet, P. Liu, M. Faul, and R. A. Sharrock
Obligate Heterodimerization of Arabidopsis Phytochromes C and E and Interaction with the PIF3 Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor
PLANT CELL,
March 1, 2009;
21(3):
786 - 799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wollenberg, B. Strasser, P. D. Cerdan, and R. M. Amasino
Acceleration of Flowering during Shade Avoidance in Arabidopsis Alters the Balance between FLOWERING LOCUS C-Mediated Repression and Photoperiodic Induction of Flowering
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2008;
148(3):
1681 - 1694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Filiault, C. A. Wessinger, J. R. Dinneny, J. Lutes, J. O. Borevitz, D. Weigel, J. Chory, and J. N. Maloof
Amino acid polymorphisms in Arabidopsis phytochrome B cause differential responses to light
PNAS,
February 26, 2008;
105(8):
3157 - 3162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Monte, B. Al-Sady, P. Leivar, and P. H. Quail
Out of the dark: how the PIFs are unmasking a dual temporal mechanism of phytochrome signalling
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 12, 2007;
(2007)
erm186v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Benedict, M. Geisler, J. Trygg, N. Huner, and V. Hurry
Consensus by Democracy. Using Meta-Analyses of Microarray and Genomic Data to Model the Cold Acclimation Signaling Pathway in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2006;
141(4):
1219 - 1232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Bennett and S. Mathews
Phylogeny of the parasitic plant family Orobanchaceae inferred from phytochrome A
Am. J. Botany,
July 1, 2006;
93(7):
1039 - 1051.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. FRANKLIN and G. C. WHITELAM
Phytochromes and Shade-avoidance Responses in Plants
Ann. Bot.,
August 1, 2005;
96(2):
169 - 175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mathews
Phytochrome Evolution in Green and Nongreen Plants
J. Hered.,
May 1, 2005;
96(3):
197 - 204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Parks
The Red Side of Photomorphogenesis
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2003;
133(4):
1437 - 1444.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Schmitt, J. R. Stinchcombe, M. S. Heschel, and H. Huber
The Adaptive Evolution of Plasticity: Phytochrome-Mediated Shade Avoidance Responses
Integr. Comp. Biol.,
July 1, 2003;
43(3):
459 - 469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|