Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 12, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.021329

Plant Physiology 132:1550-1559 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/3/1550    most recent
pp.103.021329v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, O.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, O.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzawa, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, O.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzawa, Y.
BIOENERGETICS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Structural and Biochemical Dissection of Photorespiration in Hybrids Differing in Genome Constitution between Diplotaxis tenuifolia (C3-C4) and Radish (C3)1

Osamu Ueno*, Sang Woo Bang, Yoshiharu Wada, Ayumu Kondo2, Kuni Ishihara3, Yukio Kaneko and Yasuo Matsuzawa

Plant Physiology Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8602, Japan (O.U., A.K.); Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Minemachi 350, Utsunomiya 321–0943, Japan (S.W.B., Y.W., K.I., Y.K., Y.M.)

We compared the structural, biochemical, and physiological characteristics involved in photorespiration of intergeneric hybrids differing in genome constitution (DtDtR, DtDtRR, and DtRR) between the C3-C4 intermediate species Diplotaxis tenuifolia (DtDt) and the C3 species radish (Raphanus sativus; RR). The bundle sheath (BS) cells in D. tenuifolia included many centripetally located chloroplasts and mitochondria, but those of radish had only a few chloroplasts and mitochondria. In the hybrids, the numbers of chloroplasts and mitochondria, the ratio of centripetally located organelles to total organelles, and the mitochondrial size in the BS cells increased with an increase in the constitution ratio of the Dt:R genome. The P-protein of glycine decarboxylase (GDC) was confined to the BS mitochondria in D. tenuifolia, whereas in radish, it accumulated more densely in the mesophyll than in the BS mitochondria. In the hybrids, more intense accumulation of GDC in the BS relative to the mesophyll mitochondria occurred with an increase in the Dt:R ratio. These structural and biochemical features in the hybrids were reflected in the gas exchange characteristics of leaves, such as the CO2 compensation point. Our data indicate that the leaf structure, the intercellular pattern of GDC expression, and the gas exchange characteristics of C3-C4 intermediate photosynthesis are inherited in the hybrids depending on the constitution ratio of the parent genomes. Our findings also demonstrate that the apparent reduced photorespiration in C3-C4 intermediate plants is mainly due to the structural differentiation of mitochondria and chloroplasts in the BS cells combined with the BS-dominant expression of GDC.


Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.021329.

1 This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (BioDesign Project).

2 Present address: Faculty of Agriculture, Meijyo University, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya 468–8502, Japan.

3 Present address: Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Setagaya, Tokyo 156–8502, Japan.

* Corresponding author; e-mail uenoos{at}nias.affrc.go.jp; fax 81–298–38–7408.

Received January 30, 2003; returned for revision February 25, 2003; accepted March 9, 2003.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists