Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online July 24, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.021485

Plant Physiology 132:2152-2165 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/4/2152    most recent
pp.103.021485v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gribskov, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gribskov, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gribskov, M.
GENETICS, GENOMICS, AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION

Systematic Trans-Genomic Comparison of Protein Kinases between Arabidopsis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae1

Degeng Wang*, Jeffrey F. Harper and Michael Gribskov

San Diego Supercomputer Center and Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093–0537 (D.W., M.G.); and Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037 (J.F.H.)

The genome of the budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) provides an important paradigm for transgenomic comparisons with other eukaryotic species. Here, we report a systematic comparison of the protein kinases of yeast (119 kinases) and a reference plant Arabidopsis (1,019 kinases). Using a whole-protein-based, hierarchical clustering approach, the complete set of protein kinases from both species were clustered. We validated our clustering by three observations: (a) clustering pattern of functional orthologs proven in genetic complementation experiments, (b) consistency with reported classifications of yeast kinases, and (c) consistency with the biochemical properties of those Arabidopsis kinases already experimentally characterized. The clustering pattern identified no overlap between yeast kinases and the receptor-like kinases (RLKs) of Arabidopsis. Ten more kinase families were found to be specific for one of the two species. Among them, the calcium-dependent protein kinase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase families are specific for plants, whereas the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase and provirus insertion in mouse-like kinase families were found only in yeast and animals. Three yeast kinase families, nitrogen permease reactivator/halotolerance-5), polyamine transport kinase, and negative regulator of sexual conjugation and meiosis, are absent in both plants and animals. The majority of yeast kinase families (21 of 26) display Arabidopsis counterparts, and all are mapped into Arabidopsis families of intracellular kinases that are not related to RLKs. Representatives from 11 of the common families (54 kinases from Arabidopsis and 17 from yeast) share an extremely high degree of similarity (blast E value < 10-80), suggesting the likelihood of orthologous functions. Selective expansion of yeast kinase families was observed in Arabidopsis. This is most evident for yeast genes CBK1, HRR25, and SNF1 and the kinase family S6K. Reduction of kinase families was also observed, as in the case of the NEK-like family. The distinguishing features between the two sets of kinases are the selective expansion of yeast families and the generation of a limited number of new kinase families for new functionality in Arabidopsis, most notably, the Arabidopsis RLKs that constitute important components of plant intercellular communication apparatus.


1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. DBI–9975808) and was assisted by the facilities of the National Biomedical Computation Resource (through grant no. P41–RR08605 from the National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources).

* Corresponding author; e-mail dwang{at}sdsc.edu; fax 858–822–0873.

Received February 3, 2003; returned for revision March 26, 2003; accepted May 7, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
W. Shen, M. I. Reyes, and L. Hanley-Bowdoin
Arabidopsis Protein Kinases GRIK1 and GRIK2 Specifically Activate SnRK1 by Phosphorylating Its Activation Loop
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2009; 150(2): 996 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F. Mounet, A. Moing, V. Garcia, J. Petit, M. Maucourt, C. Deborde, S. Bernillon, G. Le Gall, I. Colquhoun, M. Defernez, et al.
Gene and Metabolite Regulatory Network Analysis of Early Developing Fruit Tissues Highlights New Candidate Genes for the Control of Tomato Fruit Composition and Development
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2009; 149(3): 1505 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Ma and S. Reumann
Improved prediction of peroxisomal PTS1 proteins from genome sequences based on experimental subcellular targeting analyses as exemplified for protein kinases from Arabidopsis
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(13): 3767 - 3779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Horan, C. Jang, J. Bailey-Serres, R. Mittler, C. Shelton, J. F. Harper, J.-K. Zhu, J. C. Cushman, M. Gollery, and T. Girke
Annotating Genes of Known and Unknown Function by Large-Scale Coexpression Analysis
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2008; 147(1): 41 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. Casas-Mollano, B.-r. Jeong, J. Xu, H. Moriyama, and H. Cerutti
The MUT9p kinase phosphorylates histone H3 threonine 3 and is necessary for heritable epigenetic silencing in Chlamydomonas
PNAS, April 29, 2008; 105(17): 6486 - 6491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Vandenbroucke, S. Robbens, K. Vandepoele, D. Inze, Y. Van de Peer, and F. Van Breusegem
Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Gene Expression across Kingdoms: A Comparative Analysis
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 507 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Lecchi, C. J. Nelson, K. E. Allen, D. L. Swaney, K. L. Thompson, J. J. Coon, M. R. Sussman, and C. W. Slayman
Tandem Phosphorylation of Ser-911 and Thr-912 at the C Terminus of Yeast Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Leads to Glucose-dependent Activation
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35471 - 35481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
W. Shen and L. Hanley-Bowdoin
Geminivirus Infection Up-Regulates the Expression of Two Arabidopsis Protein Kinases Related to Yeast SNF1- and Mammalian AMPK-Activating Kinases
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2006; 142(4): 1642 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Rivals, C. Bruyere, C. Toffano-Nioche, and A. Lecharny
Formation of the Arabidopsis Pentatricopeptide Repeat Family
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2006; 141(3): 825 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Horan, J. Lauricha, J. Bailey-Serres, N. Raikhel, and T. Girke
Genome Cluster Database. A Sequence Family Analysis Platform for Arabidopsis and Rice
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2005; 138(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. R. Mahjoub, M. Qasim Rasi, and L. M. Quarmby
A NIMA-related Kinase, Fa2p, Localizes to a Novel Site in the Proximal Cilia of Chlamydomonas and Mouse Kidney Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2004; 15(11): 5172 - 5186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. L. Gutman and K. K. Niyogi
Chlamydomonas and Arabidopsis. A Dynamic Duo
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2004; 135(2): 607 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists