|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 14, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.022723 Plant Physiology 133:368-378 (2003) © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists Insect Attack and Wounding Induce Traumatic Resin Duct Development and Gene Expression of ()-Pinene Synthase in Sitka Spruce1Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada (S.A.B.M., W.L.H., S.X.W., A.L.P.); and Biotechnology Laboratory, Departments of Botany and Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada (K.-A.G., D.M.M., J.B.)
Conifers possess inducible terpenoid defense systems. These systems are associated with the formation of traumatic resin ducts (TRD) and are underpinned by enhanced gene expression and activity of terpene synthases (TPS), enzymes responsible for oleoresin formation. We first determined that Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis [Bong.] Carriere) had the capacity for TRD formation by mechanically wounding representative trees. We then proceeded to investigate whether the white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi Peck.), a stem-boring insect, can influence the expression of genes encoding monoterpene synthases (mono-tps) in Sitka spruce. We went on to compare this response with the effects of a simulated insect attack by drill wounding. A significant increase in mono-tps transcript level was observed in the leaders of lateral branches of weevil-attacked and mechanically wounded trees. In this study, weevils induced a more rapid enhancement of mono-tps gene expression. A full-length Sitka spruce mono-tps cDNA (PsTPS2) was isolated, expressed in Escherichia coli, and functionally identified as ()-pinene synthase. The recombinant ()-pinene synthase catalyzes the formation of ()-
1 This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grants to A.L.P. and J.B.), by the Human Sciences Frontier Program (grant to J.B.), by Forest Renewal B.C. (grant to A.L.P.), by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (infrastructure support grants to J.B.), and by the B.C. Knowledge and Development Funds (grant to J.B.). D.M.M. is recipient of a Walter C. Koerner fellowship from the University of British Columbia. 2 These authors contributed equally as principle investigators to this paper. * Corresponding author; e-mail Aine_Plant{at}sfu.ca; fax 604 - 291-3496. Received February 26, 2003; returned for revision April 17, 2003; accepted June 9, 2003. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|