|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 2, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.027714 Plant Physiology 133:1229-1239 (2003) © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists Functional and Phylogenetic Analyses of a Conserved Regulatory Program in the Phloem of Minor Veins1,[w]Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
The minor-vein phloem of mature leaves is developmentally and physiologically distinct from the phloem in the rest of the vascular system. Phloem loading of transport sugars occurs in the minor veins, and consistent with this, galactinol synthase is expressed in the minor veins of melon (Cucumis melo) as part of the symplastic-loading mechanism that operates in this species. A galactinol synthase promoter from melon drives gene expression in the minor-vein companion cells of both transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis. Neither of these plants use galactinol in the phloem-loading process, implying that the promoter responds to a minor-vein-specific regulatory cascade that is highly conserved across a broad range of eudicotyledons. Detailed analysis of this promoter by truncation and mutagenesis identified three closely coupled sequences that unambiguously modulate tissue specificity. These sequences cooperate in a combinatorial fashion: two promote expression throughout the vascular system of the plant, whereas the third functions to repress expression in the larger bundles. In a complementary approach, phylogenetic footprinting was used to obtain single-nucleotide resolution of conserved sites in orthologous promoters from diverse members of the Cucurbitaceae. This comparative analysis confirmed the importance of the closely coupled sites but also revealed other highly conserved sequences that may modulate promoter strength or contribute to expression patterns outside of the phloem. The conservation of this regulatory design among species that phloem load by different mechanisms supports a model for organismal development in which tissues and cell types are controlled by relatively ancient and conserved paradigms but expression of genes influencing final form and function are relatively plastic.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.027714. 1 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Services/National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (proposal no. 20013531810893 to R.T.). [w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. 2 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203. 3 Present address: Department of Biology and Astrobiology Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. * Corresponding author; e-mail bga2{at}cornell.edu; fax 6072555547. Received May 28, 2003; returned for revision July 7, 2003; accepted July 18, 2003. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | SEARCH RESULT |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|