This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pampanwar, V. Articles by Soderlund, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pampanwar, V. Articles by Soderlund, C. Agricola Articles by Pampanwar, V. Articles by Soderlund, C.

BIOINFORMATICS

FPC Web Tools for Rice, Maize, and Distribution¹

Arizona Genomic Computational Laboratory, BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 (V.P., F.E., J.H., G.G., C.S.); and Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634 (S.B.)

Many clone-based physical maps have been built with the FingerPrinted Contig (FPC) software, which is written in C and runs locally for fast and flexible analysis. If the maps were viewable only from FPC, they would not be as useful to the whole community since FPC must be installed on the user machine and the database downloaded. Hence, we have created a set of Web tools so users can easily view the FPC data and perform salient queries with standard browsers. This set includes the following four programs: WebFPC, a view of the contigs; WebChrom, the location of the contigs and genetic markers along the chromosome; WebBSS, locating user-supplied sequence on the map; and WebFCmp, comparing fingerprints. For additional FPC support, we have developed an FPC module for BioPerl and an FPC browser using the Generic Model Organism Project (GMOD) genome browser (GBrowse), where the FPC BioPerl module generates the data files for input into GBrowse. This provides an alternative to the WebChrom/WebFPC view. These tools are available to download along with documentation. The tools have been implemented for both the rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays) FPC maps, which both contain the locations of clones, markers, genetic markers, and sequenced clone (along with links to sites that contain additional information).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.056291.

^* Corresponding author; e-mail cari{at}agcol.arizona.edu; fax 5206262632.

Received November 18, 2004; returned for revision February 15, 2005; accepted February 20, 2005.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Jung, M. Staton, T. Lee, A. Blenda, R. Svancara, A. Abbott, and D. Main GDR (Genome Database for Rosaceae): integrated web-database for Rosaceae genomics and genetics data Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D1034 - D1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. I. E. Amarillo and H. W. Bass A Transgenomic Cytogenetic Sorghum (Sorghum propinquum) Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Map of Maize (Zea mays L.) Pachytene Chromosome 9, Evidence for Regions of Genome Hyperexpansion Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1509 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Lawrence, M. L. Schaeffer, T. E. Seigfried, D. A. Campbell, and L. C. Harper MaizeGDB's new data types, resources and activities Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D895 - D900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Lawrence, T. E. Seigfried, H. W. Bass, and L. K. Anderson Predicting Chromosomal Locations of Genetically Mapped Loci in Maize Using the Morgan2McClintock Translator Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 2007 - 2009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Nelson, A. K. Bharti, E. Butler, F. Wei, G. Fuks, H. Kim, R. A. Wing, J. Messing, and C. Soderlund Whole-Genome Validation of High-Information-Content Fingerprinting Plant Physiology, September 1, 2005; 139(1): 27 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]