|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 21, 2005; 10.1104/pp.105.068437 Plant Physiology 139:1444-1450 (2005) © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists Evidence That Bicarbonate Is Not the Substrate in Photosynthetic Oxygen Evolution1Abteilung Biophysik, Universität Osnabrück, 49069 Osnabrueck, Germany (J.C., W.J.); and Max-Planck-Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, 45470 Muelheim an der Ruhr, Germany (K.B., J.M.)
It is widely accepted that the oxygen produced by photosystem II of cyanobacteria, algae, and plants is derived from water. Earlier proposals that bicarbonate may serve as substrate or catalytic intermediate are almost forgotten, though not rigorously disproved. These latter proposals imply that CO2 is an intermediate product of oxygen production in addition to O2. In this work, we investigated this possible role of exchangeable HCO3 in oxygen evolution in two independent ways. (1) We studied a possible product inhibition of the electron transfer into the catalytic Mn4Ca complex during the oxygen-evolving reaction by greatly increasing the pressure of CO2. This was monitored by absorption transients in the near UV. We found that a 3,000-fold increase of the CO2 pressure over ambient conditions did not affect the UV transient, whereas the S3
1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant nos. Ju97/153 and Me1623/23), the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (W.J.), the Max-Planck Society (J.M.), and the Land Niedersachsen (W.J.). The authors responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) are: Wolfgang Junge (junge{at}uos.de) and Johannes Messinger (messinger{at}mpi-muelheim.mpg.de). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.068437. * Corresponding author; e-mail junge{at}uos.de; fax 495419692262. Received July 15, 2005; returned for revision September 2, 2005; accepted September 2, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|