Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online January 11, 2006; 10.1104/pp.105.073676

Plant Physiology 140:771-778 (2006)
© 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
140/2/771    most recent
pp.105.073676v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messinger, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mott, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messinger, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mott, K. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CARBON
*CARBON BLACK
*CARBON DIOXIDE
*DIURON
*UREA
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Messinger, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mott, K. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biology of Transpiration
WHOLE PLANT AND ECOPHYSIOLOGY

Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO21

Susanna M. Messinger, Thomas N. Buckley2 and Keith A. Mott*

Biology Department, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322–5305 (S.M.M., K.A.M.); and Environmental Biology Group and Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia (T.N.B.)

Stomatal conductance (gs) typically declines in response to increasing intercellular CO2 concentration (ci). However, the mechanisms underlying this response are not fully understood. Recent work suggests that stomatal responses to ci and red light (RL) are linked to photosynthetic electron transport. We investigated the role of photosynthetic electron transport in the stomatal response to ci in intact leaves of cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) plants by examining the responses of gs and net CO2 assimilation rate to ci in light and darkness, in the presence and absence of the photosystem II inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), and at 2% and 21% ambient oxygen. Our results indicate that (1) gs and assimilation rate decline concurrently and with similar spatial patterns in response to DCMU; (2) the response of gs to ci changes slope in concert with the transition from Rubisco- to electron transport-limited photosynthesis at various irradiances and oxygen concentrations; (3) the response of gs to ci is similar in darkness and in DCMU-treated leaves, whereas the response in light in non-DCMU-treated leaves is much larger and has a different shape; (4) the response of gs to ci is insensitive to oxygen in DCMU-treated leaves or in darkness; and (5) stomata respond normally to RL when ci is held constant, indicating the RL response does not require a reduction in ci by mesophyll photosynthesis. Together, these results suggest that part of the stomatal response to ci involves the balance between photosynthetic electron transport and carbon reduction either in the mesophyll or in guard cell chloroplasts.


1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. 0416600 to K.A.M.) and by the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting at the Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University (T.N.B.).

2 Present address: Biology Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322–5305.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Keith A. Mott (kmott{at}biology.usu.edu).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.073676.

* Corresponding author; e-mail kmott{at}biology.usu.edu; fax 435–797–1575.

Received November 1, 2005; returned for revision November 18, 2005; accepted November 20, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. Vrabl, M. Vaskova, M. Hronkova, J. Flexas, and J. Santrucek
Mesophyll conductance to CO2 transport estimated by two independent methods: effect of variable CO2 concentration and abscisic acid
J. Exp. Bot., May 11, 2009; (2009) erp115v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Monti, G. Bezzi, and G. Venturi
Internal conductance under different light conditions along the plant profile of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Brown.)
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2341 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. Lawson, S. Lefebvre, N. R. Baker, J. I. L. Morison, and C. A. Raines
Reductions in mesophyll and guard cell photosynthesis impact on the control of stomatal responses to light and CO2
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(13): 3609 - 3619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Doi and K.-i. Shimazaki
The Stomata of the Fern Adiantum capillus-veneris Do Not Respond to CO2 in the Dark and Open by Photosynthesis in Guard Cells
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 922 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J.I.L Morison, N.R Baker, P.M Mullineaux, and W.J Davies
Improving water use in crop production
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2008; 363(1491): 639 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. R. Warren
Soil water deficits decrease the internal conductance to CO2 transfer but atmospheric water deficits do not
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2008; 59(2): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
I. Baroli, G. D. Price, M. R. Badger, and S. von Caemmerer
The Contribution of Photosynthesis to the Red Light Response of Stomatal Conductance
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 737 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Tcherkez, R. Bligny, E. Gout, A. Mahe, M. Hodges, and G. Cornic
Respiratory metabolism of illuminated leaves depends on CO2 and O2 conditions
PNAS, January 15, 2008; 105(2): 797 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. Zweifel, K. Steppe, and F. J. Sterck
Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2007; 58(8): 2113 - 2131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Chaerle, I. Leinonen, H. G. Jones, and D. Van Der Straeten
Monitoring and screening plant populations with combined thermal and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2007; 58(4): 773 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. Chaerle, M. Pineda, R. Romero-Aranda, D. Van Der Straeten, and M. Baron
Robotized Thermal and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus Infection in Nicotiana benthamiana
Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1323 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Plant Biologists