|
|
||||||||
|
First published online January 27, 2006; 10.1104/pp.105.071993 Plant Physiology 140:1022-1035 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists
Effects of Feeding Spodoptera littoralis on Lima Bean Leaves. III. Membrane Depolarization and Involvement of Hydrogen Peroxide1Department of Plant Biology and Centre of Excellence CEBIOVEM, University of Turin, I10125 Turin, Italy (M.E.M, S.B., C.M.B., L.S.C., M.N., V.V., S.Q.); and Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Bioorganic Chemistry, D07745 Jena, Germany (A.M., G.-I.A., H.U., W.B.)
In response to herbivore (Spodoptera littoralis) attack, lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) leaves produced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in concentrations that were higher when compared to mechanically damaged (MD) leaves. Cellular and subcellular localization analyses revealed that H2O2 was mainly localized in MD and herbivore-wounded (HW) zones and spread throughout the veins and tissues. Preferentially, H2O2 was found in cell walls of spongy and mesophyll cells facing intercellular spaces, even though confocal laser scanning microscopy analyses also revealed the presence of H2O2 in mitochondria/peroxisomes. Increased gene and enzyme activations of superoxide dismutase after HW were in agreement with confocal laser scanning microscopy data. After MD, additional application of H2O2 prompted a transient transmembrane potential (Vm) depolarization, with a Vm depolarization rate that was higher when compared to HW leaves. In transgenic soybean (Glycine max) suspension cells expressing the Ca2+-sensing aequorin system, increasing amounts of added H2O2 correlated with a higher cytosolic calcium ([Ca2+]cyt) concentration. In MD and HW leaves, H2O2 also triggered the increase of [Ca2+]cyt, but MD-elicited [Ca2+]cyt increase was more pronounced when compared to HW leaves after addition of exogenous H2O2. The results clearly indicate that Vm depolarization caused by HW makes the membrane potential more positive and reduces the ability of lima bean leaves to react to signaling molecules.
1 This work was supported by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (Frankfurt a.M.) from the Centre of Excellence for Plant and Microbial Biosensing (Turin) and local research grants from the University of Turin, Italy. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Massimo E. Maffei (massimo.maffei{at}unito.it). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.071993. * Corresponding author; e-mail massimo.maffei{at}unito.it; fax 390112365967. Received September 29, 2005; returned for revision January 12, 2006; accepted January 12, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|