Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 12, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.080481

Plant Physiology 141:1012-1020 (2006)
© 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
141/3/1012    most recent
pp.106.080481v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Physiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barkan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Browse, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barkan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Browse, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barkan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Browse, J.
ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS AND ADAPTATION TO STRESS

A Suppressor of fab1 Challenges Hypotheses on the Role of Thylakoid Unsaturation in Photosynthetic Function1

Lenore Barkan, Perumal Vijayan2, Anders S. Carlsson3, Sergei Mekhedov4 and John Browse*

Institute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–6340 (L.B., P.V., A.S.C., J.B.); and Botany Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824–1312 (S.M.)

Leaf membrane lipids of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) fatty acid biosynthesis 1 (fab1) mutant contain a 35% to 40% increase in the predominant saturated fatty acid 16:0, relative to wild type. This increase in membrane saturation is associated with loss of photosynthetic function and death of mutant plants at low temperatures. We have initiated a suppressor screen for mutations that allow survival of fab1 plants at 2°C. Five suppressor mutants identified in this screen all rescued the collapse of photosynthetic function observed in fab1 plants. While fab1 plants died after 5 to 7 weeks at 2°C, the suppressors remained viable after 16 weeks in the cold, as judged by their ability to resume growth following a return to 22°C and to subsequently produce viable seed. Three of the suppressors had changes in leaf fatty acid composition when compared to fab1, indicating that one mechanism of suppression may involve compensating changes in thylakoid lipid composition. Surprisingly, the suppressor phenotype in one line, S31, was associated with a further substantial increase in lipid saturation. The overall leaf fatty acid composition of S31 plants contained 31% 16:0 compared with 23% in fab1 and 17% in wild type. Biochemical and genetic analysis showed that S31 plants contain a new allele of fatty acid desaturation 5 (fad5), fad5-2, and are therefore partially deficient in activity of the chloroplast 16:0 {Delta}7 desaturase. A double mutant produced by crossing fab1 to the original fad5-1 allele also remained alive at 2°C, indicating that the fad5-2 mutation is the suppressor in the S31 (fab1 fad5-2) line. Based on the biophysical characteristics of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, the increased 16:0 in fab1 fad5-2 plants would be expected to exacerbate, rather than ameliorate, low-temperature damage. We propose instead that a change in shape of the major thylakoid lipid, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, mediated by the fad5-2 mutation, may compensate for changes in lipid structure resulting from the original fab1 mutation. Our identification of mutants that suppress the low-temperature phenotype of fab1 provides new tools to understand the relationship between thylakoid lipid structure and photosynthetic function.


1 This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant no. IBN–0084329) and by the Agricultural Research Center, Washington State University.

2 Present address: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8.

3 Present address: Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Research, S–230–53, Alnarp, Sweden.

4 Present address: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.

The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the finding presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: John Browse (jab{at}wsu.edu).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.080481.

* Corresponding author; e-mail jab{at}wsu.edu; fax 509–335–7643.

Received March 15, 2006; returned for revision April 24, 2006; accepted April 26, 2006.


Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

On the Inside
Peter V. Minorsky
Plant Physiol. 2006 141: 803-804. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Plant Biologists