First published online September 15, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.087676
Plant Physiology 142:1014-1026 (2006)
© 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists
DEVELOPMENT AND HORMONE ACTION
Branching Genes Are Conserved across Species. Genes Controlling a Novel Signal in Pea Are Coregulated by Other Long-Distance Signals1
Xenie Johnson,
Tanya Brcich,
Elizabeth A. Dun,
Magali Goussot,
Karine Haurogné,
Christine A. Beveridge and
Catherine Rameau*
Station de Génétique et d'Amélioration des Plantes, Institut J.P. Bourgin, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78026 Versailles, France (X.J., M.G., K.H., C.R.); and Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Legume Research and School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia (T.B., E.A.D., C.A.B.)
Physiological and genetic studies with the ramosus (rms) mutants in garden pea (Pisum sativum) and more axillary shoots (max) mutants in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) have shown that shoot branching is regulated by a network of long-distance signals. Orthologous genes RMS1 and MAX4 control the synthesis of a novel graft-transmissible branching signal that may be a carotenoid derivative and acts as a branching inhibitor. In this study, we demonstrate further conservation of the branching control system by showing that MAX2 and MAX3 are orthologous to RMS4 and RMS5, respectively. This is consistent with the long-standing hypothesis that branching in pea is regulated by a novel long-distance signal produced by RMS1 and RMS5 and that RMS4 is implicated in the response to this signal. We examine RMS5 expression and show that it is more highly expressed relative to RMS1, but under similar transcriptional regulation as RMS1. Further expression studies support the hypothesis that RMS4 functions in shoot and rootstock and participates in the feedback regulation of RMS1 and RMS5 expression. This feedback involves a second novel long-distance signal that is lacking in rms2 mutants. RMS1 and RMS5 are also independently regulated by indole-3-acetic acid. RMS1, rather than RMS5, appears to be a key regulator of the branching inhibitor. This study presents new interactions between RMS genes and provides further evidence toward the ongoing elucidation of a model of axillary bud outgrowth in pea.
1 This work was supported by FP6 Project Grain Legumes (FOODCT2004506223), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, and Région Ile de France, by the Australian Research Council, and by Australian postgraduate awards (to T.B. and E.A.D.).
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Catherine Rameau (rameau{at}versailles.inra.fr).
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.087676
* Corresponding author; e-mail rameau{at}versailles.inra.fr; fax 33130833319.
Received July 31, 2006;
accepted September 4, 2006;
published September 15, 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Thomas and M. J. M. Hay
Axillary bud outgrowth potential is determined by parent apical bud activity
J. Exp. Bot.,
November 1, 2009;
60(15):
4275 - 4285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Beveridge, E. A. Dun, and C. Rameau
Pea Has Its Tendrils in Branching Discoveries Spanning a Century from Auxin to Strigolactones
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2009;
151(3):
985 - 990.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hayward, P. Stirnberg, C. Beveridge, and O. Leyser
Interactions between Auxin and Strigolactone in Shoot Branching Control
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2009;
151(1):
400 - 412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lin, R. Wang, Q. Qian, M. Yan, X. Meng, Z. Fu, C. Yan, B. Jiang, Z. Su, J. Li, et al.
DWARF27, an Iron-Containing Protein Required for the Biosynthesis of Strigolactones, Regulates Rice Tiller Bud Outgrowth
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2009;
21(5):
1512 - 1525.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Brewer, E. A. Dun, B. J. Ferguson, C. Rameau, and C. A. Beveridge
Strigolactone Acts Downstream of Auxin to Regulate Bud Outgrowth in Pea and Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2009;
150(1):
482 - 493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Ferguson and C. A. Beveridge
Roles for Auxin, Cytokinin, and Strigolactone in Regulating Shoot Branching
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2009;
149(4):
1929 - 1944.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. McSteen
Hormonal Regulation of Branching in Grasses
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2009;
149(1):
46 - 55.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Floss, W. Schliemann, J. Schmidt, D. Strack, and M. H. Walter
RNA Interference-Mediated Repression of MtCCD1 in Mycorrhizal Roots of Medicago truncatula Causes Accumulation of C27 Apocarotenoids, Shedding Light on the Functional Role of CCD1
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2008;
148(3):
1267 - 1282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Thomas and M. J. M. Hay
Regulation of shoot branching patterns by the basal root system: towards a predictive model
J. Exp. Bot.,
April 1, 2008;
59(6):
1163 - 1173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Frickey, V. A. Benedito, M. Udvardi, and G. Weiller
AffyTrees: Facilitating Comparative Analysis of Affymetrix Plant Microarray Chips
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2008;
146(2):
377 - 386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Ongaro and O. Leyser
Hormonal control of shoot branching
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2008;
59(1):
67 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. H. Kebrom and T. P. Brutnell
The molecular analysis of the shade avoidance syndrome in the grasses has begun
J. Exp. Bot.,
October 5, 2007;
(2007)
erm205v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Finlayson
Arabidopsis TEOSINTE BRANCHED1-LIKE 1 Regulates Axillary Bud Outgrowth and is Homologous to Monocot TEOSINTE BRANCHED1
Plant Cell Physiol.,
May 1, 2007;
48(5):
667 - 677.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Foo, S. E. Morris, K. Parmenter, N. Young, H. Wang, A. Jones, C. Rameau, C. G.N. Turnbull, and C. A. Beveridge
Feedback Regulation of Xylem Cytokinin Content Is Conserved in Pea and Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2007;
143(3):
1418 - 1428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Aguilar-Martinez, C. Poza-Carrion, and P. Cubas
Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 Acts as an Integrator of Branching Signals within Axillary Buds
PLANT CELL,
February 1, 2007;
19(2):
458 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Simons, C. A. Napoli, B. J. Janssen, K. M. Plummer, and K. C. Snowden
Analysis of the DECREASED APICAL DOMINANCE Genes of Petunia in the Control of Axillary Branching
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2007;
143(2):
697 - 706.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|