Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online September 15, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.083642

Plant Physiology 142:820-830 (2006)
© 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
142/3/820    most recent
pp.106.083642v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Z.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Z.-M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Z.-M.
GENOME ANALYSIS

Divergence of the Dof Gene Families in Poplar, Arabidopsis, and Rice Suggests Multiple Modes of Gene Evolution after Duplication1,[W]

Xiaohan Yang, Gerald A. Tuskan and (Max) Zong-Ming Cheng*

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 (X.Y., G.A.T., Z.-M.C.); and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 (X.Y., G.A.T.)

It is widely accepted that gene duplication is a primary source of genetic novelty. However, the evolutionary fate of duplicated genes remains largely unresolved. The classical Ohno's Duplication-Retention-Non/Neofunctionalization theory, and the recently proposed alternatives such as subfunctionalization or duplication-degeneration-complementation, and subneofunctionalization, each can explain one or more aspects of gene fate after duplication. Duplicated genes are also affected by epigenetic changes. We constructed a phylogenetic tree using Dof (DNA binding with one finger) protein sequences from poplar (Populus trichocarpa) Torr. & Gray ex Brayshaw, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and rice (Oryza sativa). From the phylogenetic tree, we identified 27 pairs of paralogous Dof genes in the terminal nodes. Analysis of protein motif structure of the Dof paralogs and their ancestors revealed six different gene fates after gene duplication. Differential protein methylation was revealed between a pair of duplicated poplar Dof genes, which have identical motif structure and similar expression pattern, indicating that epigenetics is involved in evolution. Analysis of reverse transcription-PCR, massively parallel signature sequencing, and microarray data revealed that the paralogs differ in expression pattern. Furthermore, analysis of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates indicated that divergence of the duplicated genes was driven by positive selection. About one-half of the motifs in Dof proteins were shared by non-Dof proteins in the three plants species, indicating that motif co-option may be one of the forces driving gene diversification. We provided evidence that the Ohno's Duplication-Retention-Non/Neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization/duplication-degeneration-complementation, and subneofunctionalization hypotheses are complementary with, not alternative to, each other.


1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. 0421743 to G.A.T. and Z.-M.C.), by the U.S. Department of Energy/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (subcontract to Z.-M.C.), and by the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: (Max) Zong-Ming Cheng (zcheng{at}utk.edu).

[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.083642

* Corresponding author; e-mail zcheng{at}utk.edu; fax 865–974–5365.

Received May 15, 2006; accepted August 26, 2006; published September 15, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P.-C. Liao, T.-P. Lin, W.-C. Lan, J.-D. Chung, and S.-Y. Hwang
Duplication of the class I cytosolic small heat shock protein gene and potential functional divergence revealed by sequence variations flanking the {alpha}-crystallin domain in the genus Rhododendron (Ericaceae)
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2010; 105(1): 57 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
Y. Guo, G. Qin, H. Gu, and L.-J. Qu
Dof5.6/HCA2, a Dof Transcription Factor Gene, Regulates Interfascicular Cambium Formation and Vascular Tissue Development in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2009; 21(11): 3518 - 3534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
B. Yuksel and A. R. Memon
Comparative phylogenetic analysis of small GTP-binding genes of model legume plants and assessment of their roles in root nodules
J. Exp. Bot., October 9, 2008; (2008) ern223v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J. Nilsson, A. Karlberg, H. Antti, M. Lopez-Vernaza, E. Mellerowicz, C. Perrot-Rechenmann, G. Sandberg, and R. P. Bhalerao
Dissecting the Molecular Basis of the Regulation of Wood Formation by Auxin in Hybrid Aspen
PLANT CELL, April 1, 2008; 20(4): 843 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Plant Biologists