|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 27, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.088898 Plant Physiology 142:1710-1717 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists Nitrite Reduces Cytoplasmic Acidosis under Anoxia1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom (I.G.L.L., M.D.F., R.G.R.); and Department of Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (P.M.v.B.)
The ameliorating effect of nitrate on the acidification of the cytoplasm during short-term anoxia was investigated in maize (Zea mays) root segments. Seedlings were grown in the presence or absence of nitrate, and changes in the cytoplasmic and vacuolar pH in response to the imposition of anoxia were measured by in vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Soluble ions and metabolites released to the suspending medium by the anoxic root segments were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and volatile metabolites were measured by gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The beneficial effect of nitrate on cytoplasmic pH regulation under anoxia occurred despite limited metabolism of nitrate under anoxia, and modest effects on the ions and metabolites, including fermentation end products, released from the anoxic root segments. Interestingly, exposing roots grown and treated in the absence of nitrate to micromolar levels of nitrite during anoxia had a beneficial effect on the cytoplasmic pH that was comparable to the effect observed for roots grown and treated in the presence of nitrate. It is argued that nitrate itself is not directly responsible for improved pH regulation under anoxia, contrary to the usual assumption, and that nitrite rather than nitrate should be the focus for further work on the beneficial effect of nitrate on flooding tolerance.
1 This work was supported by the United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (I.G.L.L., R.G.R.), St. Hugh's College, Oxford (I.G.L.L.), the University of Oxford (I.G.L.L.), and Aventis Crop Science UK (M.D.F., I.G.L.L., R.G.R.). 2 Present address: Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, Wilson Drive, East Lansing, MI 488241312. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: R.G. Ratcliffe (george.ratcliffe{at}plants.ox.ac.uk). www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.088898 * Corresponding author; e-mail george.ratcliffe{at}plants.ox.ac.uk; fax 44(0)1865275074. Received August 30, 2006; accepted October 19, 2006; published October 27, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|