Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online November 10, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.089110

Plant Physiology 143:68-77 (2007)
© 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
143/1/68    most recent
pp.106.089110v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jia, W.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jia, W.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jia, W.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biology of Transpiration

Modification of Leaf Apoplastic pH in Relation to Stomatal Sensitivity to Root-Sourced Abscisic Acid Signals1

Wensuo Jia and William John Davies*

State Key Laboratory of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Horticulture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China; and Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster Environment Centre, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom

The confocal microscope was used to determine the pH of the leaf apoplast and the pH of microvolumes of xylem sap. We quantified variation in leaf apoplast and sap pH in relation to changes in edaphic and atmospheric conditions that impacted on stomatal sensitivity to a root-sourced abscisic acid signal. Several plant species showed significant changes in the pH of both xylem sap and the apoplast of the shoot in response to environmental perturbation. Xylem sap leaving the root was generally more acidic than sap in the midrib and the apoplast of the leaf. Increasing the transpiration rate of both intact plants and detached plant parts resulted in more acidic leaf apoplast pHs. Experiments with inhibitors suggested that protons are removed from xylem sap as it moves up the plant, thereby alkalinizing the sap. The more rapid the transpiration rate and the shorter the time that the sap resided in the xylem/apoplastic pathway, the smaller the impact of proton removal on sap pH. Sap pH of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and Commelina communis did not change significantly as soil dried, while pH of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) sap increased as water availability in the soil declined. Increasing the availability of nitrate to roots also significantly alkalinized the xylem sap of tomato plants. This nitrogen treatment had the effect of enhancing the sensitivity of the stomatal response to soil drying. These responses were interpreted as an effect of nitrate addition on sap pH and closure of stomata via an abscisic acid-based mechanism.


1 This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2003CB114300), by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 30470160), by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK, and by the Royal Society of London.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: William J. Davies (w.davies{at}lancaster.ac.uk).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.089110

* Corresponding author; e-mail w.davies{at}lancaster.ac.uk; fax 44–1524–510217.

Received August 31, 2006; accepted November 5, 2006; published November 10, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. M. Chaves, J. Flexas, and C. Pinheiro
Photosynthesis Under Drought and Salt Stress: Regulation Mechanisms from Whole Plant to Cell
Ann. Bot., July 28, 2008; (2008) mcn125v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
C. Chen and G. A. Beattie
Pseudomonas syringae BetT Is a Low-Affinity Choline Transporter That Is Responsible for Superior Osmoprotection by Choline over Glycine Betaine
J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2008; 190(8): 2717 - 2725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Wilkinson and W. J. Davies
Manipulation of the apoplastic pH of intact plants mimics stomatal and growth responses to water availability and microclimatic variation
J. Exp. Bot., February 13, 2008; (2008) erm338v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Wilkinson, M. A. Bacon, and W. J. Davies
Nitrate signalling to stomata and growing leaves: interactions with soil drying, ABA, and xylem sap pH in maize
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2007; 58(7): 1705 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Plant Biologists