OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Full Text Full Text (PDF) OA All Versions of this Article: 143/1/78    most recent pp.106.089367v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Franks, P. J. Articles by Farquhar, G. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Franks, P. J. Articles by Farquhar, G. D. Agricola Articles by Franks, P. J. Articles by Farquhar, G. D. Related Collections Biology of Transpiration

The Mechanical Diversity of Stomata and Its Significance in Gas-Exchange Control^[OA]

School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia (P.J.F.); and Environmental Biology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia (G.D.F.)

Given that stomatal movement is ultimately a mechanical process and that stomata are morphologically and mechanically diverse, we explored the influence of stomatal mechanical diversity on leaf gas exchange and considered some of the constraints. Mechanical measurements were conducted on the guard cells of four different species exhibiting different stomatal morphologies, including three variants on the classical "kidney" form and one "dumb-bell" type; this information, together with gas-exchange measurements, was used to model and compare their respective operational characteristics. Based on evidence from scanning electron microscope images of cryo-sectioned leaves that were sampled under full sun and high humidity and from pressure probe measurements of the stomatal aperture versus guard cell turgor relationship at maximum and zero epidermal turgor, it was concluded that maximum stomatal apertures (and maximum leaf diffusive conductance) could not be obtained in at least one of the species (the grass Triticum aestivum) without a substantial reduction in subsidiary cell osmotic (and hence turgor) pressure during stomatal opening to overcome the large mechanical advantage of subsidiary cells. A mechanism for this is proposed, with a corollary being greatly accelerated stomatal opening and closure. Gas-exchange measurements on T. aestivum revealed the capability of very rapid stomatal movements, which may be explained by the unique morphology and mechanics of its dumb-bell-shaped stomata coupled with "see-sawing" of osmotic and turgor pressure between guard and subsidiary cells during stomatal opening or closure. Such properties might underlie the success of grasses.

^[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.089367

^* Corresponding author; e-mail peter.franks{at}jcu.edu.au; fax 61–7–4042–1319.

Received September 1, 2006; accepted November 14, 2006; published November 17, 2006.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Woodruff, F. C. Meinzer, and K. A. McCulloh Height-related trends in stomatal sensitivity to leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit in a tall conifer J. Exp. Bot., November 23, 2009; (2009) erp291v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Franks and D. J. Beerling Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time PNAS, June 23, 2009; 106(25): 10343 - 10347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Doi and K.-i. Shimazaki The Stomata of the Fern Adiantum capillus-veneris Do Not Respond to CO2 in the Dark and Open by Photosynthesis in Guard Cells Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 922 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]