This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 143/2/1068    most recent pp.106.089334v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Plant Physiol. Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaiser, H. Articles by Legner, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kaiser, H. Articles by Legner, N. Agricola Articles by Kaiser, H. Articles by Legner, N. Related Collections Biology of Transpiration

WHOLE PLANT AND ECOPHYSIOLOGY

Localization of Mechanisms Involved in Hydropassive and Hydroactive Stomatal Responses of Sambucus nigra to Dry Air¹

Botanisches Institut der Christian-Albrechts-Universität, D–24098 Kiel, Germany

The response of stomata to a reduction of air humidity is composed of a hydropassive opening followed by active closure. Whereas the mechanisms behind the hydropassive opening are largely understood, the location and physiological basis of the sensing mechanisms leading to active closure are not yet known. This study attempts to evaluate the importance of a single pore's transpiration on its own response and that of adjacent pores. Selected stomata on attached intact leaves of Sambucus nigra were sealed with mineral oil and the response to a reduction of humidity was continuously observed in situ. Blocking a pore's transpiration had no appreciable effect on hydropassive opening and subsequent stomatal closure. If the adjacent stomata were additionally sealed, the closing response was reduced, but not the hydropassive opening. On the other hand, sealing the entire leaf surface, except a small area including the observed stomata, also reduced stomatal closure. These results indicate that strictly local processes triggered by a pore's own transpiration are not required to induce stomatal closure. To describe the effect of one pore's transpiration on the hydropassive and hydroactive responses of neighboring stomata, a simple spatial model was constructed. It suggests that 90% of the closing effect covers an area of approximately 0.5 mm², whereas the effect on hydropassive opening affects an area of approximately 1 mm². This divergence may suggest mechanisms other than or in addition to those involving changes of local leaf water potential.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Hartmut Kaiser (hkaiser{at}bot.uni-kiel.de).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.089334

^* Corresponding author; e-mail hkaiser{at}bot.uni-kiel.de; fax 49–431–880–5568.

Received September 1, 2006; accepted November 27, 2006; published December 8, 2006.

Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

On the Inside

Peter V. Minorsky
Plant Physiol. 2007 143: 553-554. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Kang, W. H. Outlaw Jr, G. B. Fiore, and K. A. Riddle Guard cell apoplastic photosynthate accumulation corresponds to a phloem-loading mechanism J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2007; 58(15-16): 4061 - 4070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]