|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 8, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.088708 Plant Physiology 143:876-892 (2007) © 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Gradual Soil Water Depletion Results in Reversible Changes of Gene Expression, Protein Profiles, Ecophysiology, and Growth Performance in Populus euphratica, a Poplar Growing in Arid Regions1,[W],[OA]Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique Nancy, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1137 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-Université Henri Poincaré Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières, Institut Fédératif de Recherche 110 Génomique, Ecophysiologie et Ecologie Fonctionnelle, F54280 Champenoux, France (M.-B.B.-T., D.L.T., E.D.); Plant Biology, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, FIN00014 Helsinki, Finland (M.B., J.K.); Centre de Recherche Public-Gabriel Lippmann, Cellule de Recherche en Environnement et Biotechnologies, L4422 Belvaux, Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (J.R., L.J., J.-F.H.); Institut für Forstbotanik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37077 Goettingen, Germany (P.F., T.T., A.P.); Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant, Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, Rehovot 76100, Israel (B.V., A.A.); and Laboratory of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Biology (E.W., K.L.), and Center for Proteome Analysis and Mass Spectrometry (E.W., K.L.), University of Antwerp, B2020 Antwerp, Belgium
The responses of Populus euphratica Oliv. plants to soil water deficit were assessed by analyzing gene expression, protein profiles, and several plant performance criteria to understand the acclimation of plants to soil water deficit. Young, vegetatively propagated plants originating from an arid, saline field site were submitted to a gradually increasing water deficit for 4 weeks in a greenhouse and were allowed to recover for 10 d after full reirrigation. Time-dependent changes and intensity of the perturbations induced in shoot and root growth, xylem anatomy, gas exchange, and water status were recorded. The expression profiles of approximately 6,340 genes and of proteins and metabolites (pigments, soluble carbohydrates, and oxidative compounds) were also recorded in mature leaves and in roots (gene expression only) at four stress levels and after recovery. Drought successively induced shoot growth cessation, stomatal closure, moderate increases in oxidative stress-related compounds, loss of CO2 assimilation, and root growth reduction. These effects were almost fully reversible, indicating that acclimation was dominant over injury. The physiological responses were paralleled by fully reversible transcriptional changes, including only 1.5% of the genes on the array. Protein profiles displayed greater changes than transcript levels. Among the identified proteins for which expressed sequence tags were present on the array, no correlation was found between transcript and protein abundance. Acclimation to water deficit involves the regulation of different networks of genes in roots and shoots. Such diverse requirements for protecting and maintaining the function of different plant organs may render plant engineering or breeding toward improved drought tolerance more complex than previously anticipated.
1 This work was supported by the Commission of the European Union (contract ESTABLISH, no. QLK5CT200001377, coordinator A.P., University of Göttingen, Germany, within the Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources Programme) and by the German Science Foundation to the Poplar Research Group. 2 These authors contributed equally to the paper. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot (triboulo{at}nancy.inra.fr). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.088708 * Corresponding author; e-mail triboulo{at}nancy.inra.fr; fax 33383394069. Received September 9, 2006; accepted November 21, 2006; published December 8, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|