Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online January 5, 2007; 10.1104/pp.106.092817

Plant Physiology 143:1327-1346 (2007)
© 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
143/3/1327    most recent
pp.106.092817v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faurobert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Causse, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faurobert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Causse, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Faurobert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Causse, M.
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, AND GENE REGULATION

Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening[OA]

Mireille Faurobert*, Christina Mihr, Nadia Bertin, Tomasz Pawlowski, Luc Negroni, Nicolas Sommerer and Mathilde Causse

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, INRA, UR 1052, Domaine Saint-Maurice, 84143 Montfavet cedex, France (M.F., C.M., M.C.); Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles, INRA, UR 1115, Domaine Saint-Paul, 84914 Avignon cedex 9, France (N.B.); Instytut Dendrologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, 62–035 Kornik, Poland (T.P.); Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche de Génétique Végétale, Institut Fédératif de Recherche 87, Plate-Forme de Protéomique du Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France (L.N.); and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Recherches Protéomique, INRA, UR 1199, 34000 Montpellier, France (N.S.)

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a model plant for studying fleshy fruit development. Several genetic and molecular approaches have been developed to increase our knowledge about the physiological basis of fruit growth, but very few data are yet available at the proteomic level. The main stages of fruit development were first determined through the dynamics of fruit diameter and pericarp cell number. Then, total proteins were extracted from pericarp tissue at six relevant developmental stages and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Protein patterns were markedly different between stages. Proteins showing major variations were monitored. We identified 90 of 1,791 well-resolved spots either by matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization time-of-flight peptide mass fingerprinting or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry sequencing and expressed sequence tag database searching. Clustered correlation analysis results pointed out groups of proteins with similar expression profiles during fruit development. In young fruit, spots linked to amino acid metabolism or protein synthesis were mainly expressed during the cell division stage and down-regulated later. Some spots linked to cell division processes could be identified. During the cell expansion phase, spots linked to photosynthesis and proteins linked to cell wall formation transiently increased. In contrast, the major part of the spots related to C compounds and carbohydrate metabolism or oxidative processes were up-regulated during fruit development, showing an increase in spot intensity during development and maximal abundance in mature fruit. This was also the case for spots linked to stress responses and fruit senescence. We discuss protein variations, taking into account their potential role during fruit growth and comparing our results with already known variations at mRNA and metabolite-profiling levels.


The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Mireille Faurobert (mireille.faurobert{at}avignon.inra.fr).

[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.092817

* Corresponding author; e-mail mireille.faurobert{at}avignon.inra.fr; fax 33–4–32–72–27–02.

Received November 9, 2006; accepted December 20, 2006; published January 5, 2007.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Carli, S. Arima, V. Fogliano, L. Tardella, L. Frusciante, and M. R. Ercolano
Use of network analysis to capture key traits affecting tomato organoleptic quality
J. Exp. Bot., June 10, 2009; (2009) erp177v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
Q. Wang, T. Lai, G. Qin, and S. Tian
Response of Jujube Fruits to Exogenous Oxalic Acid Treatment Based on Proteomic Analysis
Plant Cell Physiol., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 230 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Plant Biologists