|
|
||||||||
|
First published online March 2, 2007; 10.1104/pp.106.093013 Plant Physiology 144:479-486 (2007) © 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Coordinate Regulation of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase by Light and CO2 during C4 Photosynthesis1,[OA]Robert Hill Institute and Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the phosphorylation and activation states of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and to investigate how the phosphorylation states of PEPCK and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) are coordinated in response to light intensity and CO2 concentration during photosynthesis in leaves of the C4 plant Guinea grass (Panicum maximum). There was a linear, reciprocal relationship between the phosphorylation state of PEPCK and its activation state, determined in a selective assay that distinguishes phosphorylated from nonphosphorylated forms of the enzyme. At high photon flux density and high CO2 (750 µL L1), PEPC was maximally phosphorylated and PEPCK maximally dephosphorylated within 1 h of illumination. The phosphorylation state of both enzymes did not saturate until high light intensities (about 1,400 µmol quanta m2 s1) were reached. After illumination at lower light intensities and CO2 concentrations, the overall change in phosphorylation state was smaller and it took longer for the change in phosphorylation state to occur. Phosphorylation states of PEPC and PEPCK showed a strikingly similar, but inverse, pattern in relation to changes in light and CO2. The protein phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, promoted the phosphorylation of both enzymes. The protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, blocked dark phosphorylation of PEPCK. The data show that PEPC and PEPCK phosphorylation states are closely coordinated in vivo, despite being located in the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, respectively.
1 This work was supported by a research grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom (grant no. BBSRC 50/P14423). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Richard C. Leegood (r.leegood{at}shef.ac.uk). [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.093013 * Corresponding author; e-mail r.leegood{at}shef.ac.uk; fax 441142220050. Received November 16, 2006; accepted February 1, 2007; published March 2, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|