Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online April 23, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.119503

Plant Physiology 147:790-801 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/2/790    most recent
pp.108.119503v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Physiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griebel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zeier, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griebel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zeier, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Griebel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zeier, J.
PLANTS INTERACTING WITH OTHER ORGANISMS

Light Regulation and Daytime Dependency of Inducible Plant Defenses in Arabidopsis: Phytochrome Signaling Controls Systemic Acquired Resistance Rather Than Local Defense1

Thomas Griebel and Jürgen Zeier*

Julius-von-Sachs-Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Würzburg, D–97082 Würzburg, Germany (T.G.); and Department of Biology, Plant Biology Section, University of Fribourg, CH–1700 Fribourg, Switzerland (J.Z.)

We have examined molecular and physiological principles underlying the light dependency of defense activation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants challenged with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Within a fixed light/dark cycle, plant defense responses and disease resistance significantly depend on the time of day when pathogen contact takes place. Morning and midday inoculations result in higher salicylic acid accumulation, faster expression of pathogenesis-related genes, and a more pronounced hypersensitive response than inoculations in the evening or at night. Rather than to the plants' circadian rhythm, this increased plant defense capability upon day inoculations is attributable to the availability of a prolonged light period during the early plant-pathogen interaction. Moreover, pathogen responses of Arabidopsis double mutants affected in light perception, i.e. cryptochrome1cryptochrome2 (cry1cry2), phototropin1phototropin2 (phot1phot2), and phytochromeAphytochromeB (phyAphyB) were assessed. Induction of defense responses by either avirulent or virulent P. syringae at inoculation sites is relatively robust in leaves of photoreceptor mutants, indicating little cross talk between local defense and light signaling. In addition, the blue-light receptor mutants cry1cry2 and phot1phot2 are both capable of establishing a full systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response. Induction of SAR and salicylic-acid-dependent systemic defense reactions, however, are compromised in phyAphyB mutants. Phytochrome regulation of SAR involves the essential SAR component FLAVIN-DEPENDENT MONOOXYGENASE1. Our findings highlight the importance of phytochrome photoperception during systemic rather than local resistance induction. The phytochrome system seems to accommodate the supply of light energy to the energetically costly increase in whole plant resistance.


1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. B2, Graduiertenkolleg 1342).

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Jürgen Zeier (juergen.zeier{at}unifr.ch).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.119503

* Corresponding author; e-mail juergen.zeier{at}unifr.ch.

Received March 25, 2008; accepted April 16, 2008; published April 23, 2008.


Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

On the Inside
Peter V. Minorsky
Plant Physiol. 2008 147: 439-440. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
L. C. Roden and R. A. Ingle
Lights, Rhythms, Infection: The Role of Light and the Circadian Clock in Determining the Outcome of Plant-Pathogen Interactions
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2009; 21(9): 2546 - 2552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. E. Moreno, Y. Tao, J. Chory, and C. L. Ballare
Ecological modulation of plant defense via phytochrome control of jasmonate sensitivity
PNAS, March 24, 2009; 106(12): 4935 - 4940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
E. Attaran, T. E. Zeier, T. Griebel, and J. Zeier
Methyl Salicylate Production and Jasmonate Signaling Are Not Essential for Systemic Acquired Resistance in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, March 1, 2009; 21(3): 954 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists