|
|
||||||||
|
First published online June 6, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.120402 Plant Physiology 147:1898-1912 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists
A Comparison of Leaf and Petal Senescence in Wallflower Reveals Common and Distinct Patterns of Gene Expression and Physiology1,[W]Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff CF10 3TL, United Kingdom (A.M.P., D.F.A.O., F.M.S., R.S., R.A., H.J.R.); Warwick HRI, University of Warwick, Wellesbourne, Warwick, Warwickshire CV35 9EF, United Kingdom (V.B.-W.); and School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom (A.D.S.)
Petals and leaves share common evolutionary origins but perform very different functions. However, few studies have compared leaf and petal senescence within the same species. Wallflower (Erysimum linifolium), an ornamental species closely related to Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), provide a good species in which to study these processes. Physiological parameters were used to define stages of development and senescence in leaves and petals and to align these stages in the two organs. Treatment with silver thiosulfate confirmed that petal senescence in wallflower is ethylene dependent, and treatment with exogenous cytokinin and 6-methyl purine, an inhibitor of cytokinin oxidase, suggests a role for cytokinins in this process. Subtractive libraries were created, enriched for wallflower genes whose expression is up-regulated during leaf or petal senescence, and used to create a microarray, together with 91 senescence-related Arabidopsis probes. Several microarray hybridization classes were observed demonstrating similarities and differences in gene expression profiles of these two organs. Putative functions were ascribed to 170 sequenced DNA fragments from the libraries. Notable similarities between leaf and petal senescence include a large proportion of remobilization-related genes, such as the cysteine protease gene SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED GENE12 that was up-regulated in both tissues with age. Interesting differences included the up-regulation of chitinase and glutathione S-transferase genes in senescing petals while their expression remained constant or fell with age in leaves. Semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of selected genes from the suppression subtractive hybridization libraries revealed more complex patterns of expression compared with the array data.
1 This work was supported by grants from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (to A.M.P.), the Chilean Government, Ministry of Agriculture (to D.F.A.O.), and the Malaysian Government (to F.M.S.). 2 Present address: Centre for Molecular Oncology, Institute of Cancer, Barts, and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Hilary J. Rogers (rogershj{at}cf.ac.uk). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.120402 * Corresponding author; e-mail rogershj{at}cf.ac.uk. Received April 2, 2008; accepted June 2, 2008; published June 6, 2008.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|