|
|
||||||||
|
First published online July 30, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.125435 Plant Physiology 148:1021-1031 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
UV-Induced DNA Damage Promotes Resistance to the Biotrophic Pathogen Hyaloperonospora parasitica in Arabidopsis1,[C],[OA]School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia (B.A.K., P.K.D., D.M.G., P.G.M., D.M.C.); and School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia (P.M.S.)
Plant innate immunity to pathogenic microorganisms is activated in response to recognition of extracellular or intracellular pathogen molecules by transmembrane receptors or resistance proteins, respectively. The defense signaling pathways share components with those involved in plant responses to UV radiation, which can induce expression of plant genes important for pathogen resistance. Such intriguing links suggest that UV treatment might activate resistance to pathogens in normally susceptible host plants. Here, we demonstrate that pre-inoculative UV (254 nm) irradiation of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) susceptible to infection by the biotrophic oomycete Hyaloperonospora parasitica, the causative agent of downy mildew, induces dose- and time-dependent resistance to the pathogen detectable up to 7 d after UV exposure. Limiting repair of UV photoproducts by postirradiation incubation in the dark, or mutational inactivation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase, (6-4) photoproduct photolyase, or nucleotide excision repair increased the magnitude of UV-induced pathogen resistance. In the absence of treatment with 254-nm UV, plant nucleotide excision repair mutants also defective for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer or (6-4) photoproduct photolyase displayed resistance to H. parasitica, partially attributable to short wavelength UV-B (280–320 nm) radiation emitted by incubator lights. These results indicate UV irradiation can initiate the development of resistance to H. parasitica in plants normally susceptible to the pathogen and point to a key role for UV-induced DNA damage. They also suggest UV treatment can circumvent the requirement for recognition of H. parasitica molecules by Arabidopsis proteins to activate an immune response.
1 This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (D.M.C., B.A.K., P.M.S.) and by Deakin University (D.M.C., B.A.K.). 2 Present address: School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. 3 Present address: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721–0036. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: David M. Cahill (david.cahill{at}deakin.edu.au). [C] Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition. [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.125435 * Corresponding author; e-mail david.cahill{at}deakin.edu.au. Received June 26, 2008; accepted July 28, 2008; published July 30, 2008.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|