First published online November 14, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.129783
Plant Physiology 149:575-584 (2009)
© 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
WHOLE PLANT AND ECOPHYSIOLOGY
Hydraulic Failure Defines the Recovery and Point of Death in Water-Stressed Conifers[OA]
Tim J. Brodribb* and
Hervé Cochard
University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (T.J.B.); INRA, UMR 547 PIAF, F–63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France (H.C.); and Université Blaise Pascal, UMR 547 PIAF, F–63177 Aubière, France (H.C.)
This study combines existing hydraulic principles with recently developed methods for probing leaf hydraulic function to determine whether xylem physiology can explain the dynamic response of gas exchange both during drought and in the recovery phase after rewatering. Four conifer species from wet and dry forests were exposed to a range of water stresses by withholding water and then rewatering to observe the recovery process. During both phases midday transpiration and leaf water potential ( leaf) were monitored. Stomatal responses to leaf were established for each species and these relationships used to evaluate whether the recovery of gas exchange after drought was limited by postembolism hydraulic repair in leaves. Furthermore, the timing of gas-exchange recovery was used to determine the maximum survivable water stress for each species and this index compared with data for both leaf and stem vulnerability to water-stress-induced dysfunction measured for each species. Recovery of gas exchange after water stress took between 1 and >100 d and during this period all species showed strong 1:1 conformity to a combined hydraulic-stomatal limitation model (r2 = 0.70 across all plants). Gas-exchange recovery time showed two distinct phases, a rapid overnight recovery in plants stressed to <50% loss of leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf) and a highly leaf-dependent phase in plants stressed to >50% loss of Kleaf. Maximum recoverable water stress ( min) corresponded to a 95% loss of Kleaf. Thus, we conclude that xylem hydraulics represents a direct limit to the drought tolerance of these conifer species.
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Tim J. Brodribb (timothyb{at}utas.edu.au).
[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.129783
* Corresponding author; e-mail timothyb{at}utas.edu.au.
Received September 10, 2008;
accepted November 11, 2008;
published November 14, 2008.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Cochard, S. Herbette, E. Hernandez, T. Holtta, and M. Mencuccini
The effects of sap ionic composition on xylem vulnerability to cavitation
J. Exp. Bot.,
October 19, 2009;
(2009)
erp298v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fichot, F. Laurans, R. Monclus, A. Moreau, G. Pilate, and F. Brignolas
Xylem anatomy correlates with gas exchange, water-use efficiency and growth performance under contrasting water regimes: evidence from Populus deltoides x Populus nigra hybrids
Tree Physiol,
October 13, 2009;
(2009)
tpp087v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Cochard, T. Holtta, S. Herbette, S. Delzon, and M. Mencuccini
New Insights into the Mechanisms of Water-Stress-Induced Cavitation in Conifers
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2009;
151(2):
949 - 954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Xu, G. Zhou, and H. Shimizu
Are plant growth and photosynthesis limited by pre-drought following rewatering in grass?
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2009;
60(13):
3737 - 3749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Adams, M. Guardiola-Claramonte, G. A. Barron-Gafford, J. C. Villegas, D. D. Breshears, C. B. Zou, P. A. Troch, and T. E. Huxman
Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought
PNAS,
April 28, 2009;
106(17):
7063 - 7066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Koch and S. C. Sillett
A response to: Limitations within "The Limits to Tree Height"
Am. J. Botany,
February 1, 2009;
96(2):
545 - 547.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|