Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online January 7, 2009; 10.1104/pp.108.133165

Plant Physiology 149:1493-1504 (2009)
© 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
149/3/1493    most recent
pp.108.133165v2
pp.108.133165v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krizova, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kovarik, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krizova, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kovarik, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Krizova, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kovarik, A.
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, AND GENE REGULATION

Cell Culture-Induced Gradual and Frequent Epigenetic Reprogramming of Invertedly Repeated Tobacco Transgene Epialleles1,[W]

Katerina Krizova, Miloslava Fojtova*, Ann Depicker and Ales Kovarik

Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic (K.K., M.F., A.K.); and Department of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology, and Department of Molecular Genetics, Ghent University, B–9052 Ghent, Belgium (A.D.)

Using a two-component transgene system involving two epiallelic variants of the invertedly repeated transgenes in locus 1 (Lo1) and a homologous single-copy transgene locus 2 (Lo2), we have studied the stability of the methylation patterns and trans-silencing interactions in cell culture and regenerated tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants. The posttranscriptionally silenced (PTGS) epiallele of the Lo1 trans-silences and trans-methylates the target Lo2 in a hybrid (Lo1/Lo2 line), while its transcriptionally silenced variant (Lo1E) does not. This pattern was stable over several generations in plants. However, in early Lo1E/Lo2 callus, decreased transgene expression and partial loss of Lo1E promoter methylation compared with leaf tissue in the parental plant were observed. Analysis of small RNA species and coding region methylation suggested that the transgenes were silenced by a PTGS mechanism. The Lo1/Lo2 line remained silenced, but the nonmethylated Lo1 promoter acquired partial methylation in later callus stages. These data indicate that a cell culture process has brought both epialleles to a similar epigenetic ground. Bisulfite sequencing of the 35S promoter within the Lo1 silencer revealed molecules with no, intermediate, and high levels of methylation, demonstrating, to our knowledge for the first time, cell-to-cell methylation diversity of callus. Regenerated plants showed high interindividual but low intraindividual epigenetic variability, indicating that the callus-induced epiallelic variants were transmitted to plants and became fixed. We propose that epigenetic changes associated with dedifferentiation might influence regulatory pathways mediated by trans-PTGS processes.


1 This work was supported by the Academy of Sciences (grant nos. A600040611, AV0Z50040702, and AVOZ50040507), the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grant nos. 204/05/H505 and 521/07/0116), and MSMT (grant no. LC06004). M.F. and A.K. acknowledge the Research Foundation Flanders for regular visiting fellowships.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Miloslava Fojtova (fojtova{at}ibp.cz).

[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.133165

* Corresponding author; e-mail fojtova{at}ibp.cz.

Received November 25, 2008; accepted December 22, 2008; published January 7, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Plant Biologists