Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online April 29, 2009; 10.1104/pp.109.138222

Plant Physiology 150:1072-1082 (2009)
© 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
150/2/1072    most recent
pp.109.138222v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Physiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, D.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Schardl, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, D.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Schardl, C. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, D.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Schardl, C. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Plant-Herbivore Interactions
Right arrow The Grasses
PLANTS INTERACTING WITH OTHER ORGANISMS

Regulation of a Chemical Defense against Herbivory Produced by Symbiotic Fungi in Grass Plants1,2,[W],[OA]

Dong-Xiu Zhang3, Padmaja Nagabhyru and Christopher L. Schardl*

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40146–0312

Neotyphodium uncinatum and Neotyphodium siegelii are fungal symbionts (endophytes) of meadow fescue (MF; Lolium pratense), which they protect from insects by producing loline alkaloids. High levels of lolines are produced following insect damage or mock herbivory (clipping). Although loline alkaloid levels were greatly elevated in regrowth after clipping, loline-alkaloid biosynthesis (LOL) gene expression in regrowth and basal tissues was similar to unclipped controls. The dramatic increase of lolines in regrowth reflected the much higher concentrations in young (center) versus older (outer) leaf blades, so LOL gene expression was compared in these tissues. In MF-N. siegelii, LOL gene expression was similar in younger and older leaf blades, whereas expression of N. uncinatum LOL genes and some associated biosynthesis genes was higher in younger than older leaf blades. Because lolines are derived from amino acids that are mobilized to new growth, we tested the amino acid levels in center and outer leaf blades. Younger leaf blades of aposymbiotic plants (no endophyte present) had significantly higher levels of asparagine and sometimes glutamine compared to older leaf blades. The amino acid levels were much lower in MF-N. siegelii and MF-N. uncinatum compared to aposymbiotic plants and MF with Epichloë festucae (a closely related symbiont), which lacked lolines. We conclude that loline alkaloid production in young tissue depleted these amino acid pools and was apparently regulated by availability of the amino acid substrates. As a result, lolines maximally protect young host tissues in a fashion similar to endogenous plant metabolites that conform to optimal defense theory.


1 This work was supported by U.S. Department of Agriculture Grants 200506271031 and 200710021743. The Epichloë festucae genome sequence was determined with support of National Science Foundation Grant EF–0523661, and meadow fescue cDNA sequences were obtained with support of U.S. Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative Grant 20053531916141.

2 Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station publication number 09–12–048 published with the approval of the director.

3 Present address: Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, College of Life Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Christopher L. Schardl (schardl{at}uky.edu).

[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

[OA] Open access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.109.138222

* Corresponding author; e-mail schardl{at}uky.edu.

Received March 12, 2009; accepted April 20, 2009; published April 29, 2009.


Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

On the Inside
Peter V. Minorsky
Plant Physiol. 2009 150: 533-534. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Plant Biologists