|
|
||||||||
|
First published online April 15, 2009; 10.1104/pp.108.131458 Plant Physiology 150:1093-1104 (2009) © 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists
Aquaporin-Mediated Reduction in Maize Root Hydraulic Conductivity Impacts Cell Turgor and Leaf Elongation Even without Changing Transpiration1,[W]Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, UMR759 INRA/Montpellier SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France (C.E., F.T., T.S.); and Biochimie et Physiologie Moléculaire des Plantes, UMR5004 CNRS/UMR0386 INRA/Montpellier SupAgro/Université Montpellier 2, 34060 Montpellier, France (C.M.)
Root hydraulic conductivity in plants (Lpr) exhibits large variations in response to abiotic stimuli. In this study, we investigated the impact of dynamic, aquaporin-mediated changes of Lpr on leaf growth, water potential, and water flux throughout the plant. For this, we manipulated Lpr by subjecting roots to four independent treatments, with aquaporin inhibitors applied either to transpiring maize (Zea mays) plants grown in hydroponics or to detopped root systems for estimation of Lpr. The treatments were acid load at pH 6.0 and 5.0 and hydrogen peroxide and anoxia applied for 1 to 2 h and subsequently reversed. First, we established that acid load affected cell hydraulic conductivity in maize root cortex. Lpr was reduced by all treatments by 31% to 63%, with half-times of about 15 min, and partly recovered when treatments were reversed. Cell turgor measured in the elongating zone of leaves decreased synchronously with Lpr, and leaf elongation rate closely followed these changes across all treatments in a dose-dependent manner. Leaf and xylem water potentials also followed changes in Lpr. Stomatal conductance and rates of transpiration and water uptake were not affected by Lpr reduction under low evaporative demand. Increased evaporative demand, when combined with acid load at pH 6.0, induced stomatal closure and amplified all other responses without altering their synchrony. Root pressurization reversed the impact of acid load or anoxia on leaf elongation rate and water potential, further indicating that changes in turgor mediated the response of leaf growth to reductions in Lpr.
1 This work was supported by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (doctoral fellowship to C.E. and grant no. AIP300), the French Ministry of Research (grant no. ACI2003 [Biologie du Développement et Physiologie Intégrative] to C.M. and T.S.), and Agence Nationale de la Recherche Génoplante (award to F.T.). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Thierry Simonneau (thierry.simonneau{at}supagro.inra.fr). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.131458 * Corresponding author; e-mail thierry.simonneau{at}supagro.inra.fr. Received October 20, 2008; accepted April 11, 2009; published April 15, 2009.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|