|
|
||||||||
|
First published online May 20, 2009; 10.1104/pp.109.140269 Plant Physiology 150:1482-1493 (2009) © 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
CDKB1;1 Forms a Functional Complex with CYCA2;3 to Suppress Endocycle Onset1,[W],[OA]Department of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology, 9052 Ghent, Belgium (V.B., T.L., J.B., J.V.L., H.V.D.D., S.M., G.V.I., E.R., G.D.J., D.I., L.D.V.); Department of Plant Biotechnology and Genetics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium (V.B., T.L., J.B., J.V.L., H.V.D.D., S.M., G.V.I., E.R., G.D.J., D.I., L.D.V.); Institut des Sciences du Végétal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Propre de Recherche 2355, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France (E.K.); Institute for Plant Genomics, Human Biotechnology, and Bioenergy, Bay Zoltan Foundation for Applied Research, 6726 Szeged, Hungary (E.K.); Department of Biology, Center for Proteome Analysis and Mass Spectrometry, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium (E.W.); and Flemish Institute for Technological Research, 2400 Mol, Belgium (E.W.)
The mitosis-to-endocycle transition requires the controlled inactivation of M phase-associated cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity. Previously, the B-type CDKB1;1 was identified as an important negative regulator of endocycle onset. Here, we demonstrate that CDKB1;1 copurifies and associates with the A2-type cyclin CYCA2;3. Coexpression of CYCA2;3 with CDKB1;1 triggered ectopic cell divisions and inhibited endoreduplication. Moreover, the enhanced endoreduplication phenotype observed after overexpression of a dominant-negative allele of CDKB1;1 could be partially complemented by CYCA2;3 co-overexpression, illustrating that both subunits unite in vivo to form a functional complex. CYCA2;3 protein stability was found to be controlled by CCS52A1, an activator of the anaphase-promoting complex. We conclude that CCS52A1 participates in endocycle onset by down-regulating CDKB1;1 activity through the destruction of CYCA2;3.
1 This work was supported by the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program (grant no. VI/33), initiated by the Belgian State, Science Policy Office, by the Institute for the Promotion and Innovation through Science and Technology (Generisch Basisonderzoek aan de Universiteiten grant nos. 20193 and 20176 and predoctoral fellowship to T.L.), by the Research Foundation-Flanders (grant no. G008306 and postdoctoral fellowships to V.B. and L.D.V.), and by the European Union Human Resources and Mobility for an Early Stage Training (grant no. MESTCT2004514632 to J.B.). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Lieven De Veylder (lieven.deveylder{at}psb.vib-ugent.be). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.109.140269 * Corresponding author; e-mail lieven.deveylder{at}psb.vib-ugent.be. Received April 22, 2009; accepted May 15, 2009; published May 20, 2009. Related articles in Plant Physiol.:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|