Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 3, 2009; 10.1104/pp.109.138438

Plant Physiology 150:1844-1854 (2009)
© 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
150/4/1844    most recent
pp.109.138438v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayberry, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, K. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayberry, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, K. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mayberry, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, K. S.
BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES AND MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES

Evidence for Variation in the Optimal Translation Initiation Complex: Plant eIF4B, eIF4F, and eIF(iso)4F Differentially Promote Translation of mRNAs1,[OA]

Laura K. Mayberry, M. Leah Allen, Michael D. Dennis and Karen S. Browning*

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712

Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4B is known to interact with multiple initiation factors, mRNA, rRNA, and poly(A) binding protein (PABP). To gain a better understanding of the function of eIF4B, the two isoforms from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) were expressed and analyzed using biophysical and biochemical methods. Plant eIF4B was found by ultracentrifugation and light scattering analysis to most likely be a monomer with an extended structure. An extended structure would facilitate the multiple interactions of eIF4B with mRNA as well as other initiation factors (eIF4A, eIF4G, PABP, and eIF3). Eight mRNAs, barley (Hordeum vulgare) {alpha}-amylase mRNA, rabbit β-hemoglobin mRNA, Arabidopsis heat shock protein 21 (HSP21) mRNA, oat (Avena sativa) globulin, wheat (Triticum aestivum) germin, maize (Zea mays) alcohol dehydrogenase, satellite tobacco necrosis virus RNA, and alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) 4, were used in wheat germ in vitro translation assays to measure their dependence on eIF4B and eIF4F isoforms. The two Arabidopsis eIF4B isoforms, as well as native and recombinant wheat eIF4B, showed similar responses in the translation assay. AMV RNA 4 and Arabidopsis HSP21 showed only a slight dependence on the presence of eIF4B isoforms, whereas rabbit β-hemoglobin mRNA and wheat germin mRNA showed modest dependence. Barley {alpha}-amylase, oat globulin, and satellite tobacco necrosis virus RNA displayed the strongest dependence on eIF4B. These results suggest that eIF4B has some effects on mRNA discrimination during initiation of translation. Barley {alpha}-amylase, oat globulin, and rabbit β-hemoglobin mRNA showed the highest activity with eIF4F, whereas Arabidopsis HSP21 and AMV RNA 4 used both eIF4F and eIF(iso)4F equally well. These results suggest that differential or optimal translation of mRNAs may require initiation complexes composed of specific isoforms of initiation factor gene products. Thus, individual mRNAs or classes of mRNAs may respond to the relative abundance of a particular initiation factor(s), which in turn may affect the amount of protein translated. It is likely that optimal multifactor initiation complexes exist that allow for optimal translation of mRNAs under a variety of cellular conditions.


1 This work was supported by grants from the Department of Energy (DE–FG02–04ER15575), the National Science Foundation (MCB0214996), and The Welch Foundation (F1339) to K.S.B.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Karen S. Browning (kbrowning{at}mail.utexas.edu).

[OA] Open access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.109.138438

* Corresponding author; e-mail kbrowning{at}mail.utexas.edu.

Received March 10, 2009; accepted May 28, 2009; published June 3, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Plant Biologists