This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 151/1/448    most recent pp.109.141978v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Google Scholar Articles by Rasulov, B. Articles by Niinemets, U. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rasulov, B. Articles by Niinemets, U. Agricola Articles by Rasulov, B. Articles by Niinemets, U.

WHOLE PLANT AND ECOPHYSIOLOGY

Evidence That Light, Carbon Dioxide, and Oxygen Dependencies of Leaf Isoprene Emission Are Driven by Energy Status in Hybrid Aspen¹

Department of Plant Physiology, University of Tartu, 51010 Tartu, Estonia (B.R., M.V., A.L.); and Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu 51014, Estonia (K.H., Ü.N.)

Leaf isoprene emission scales positively with light intensity, is inhibited by high carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentrations, and may be enhanced or inhibited by low oxygen (O₂) concentrations, but the mechanisms of environmental regulation of isoprene emission are still not fully understood. Emission controls by isoprene synthase, availability of carbon intermediates, or energetic cofactors have been suggested previously. In this study, we asked whether the short-term (tens of minutes) environmental control of isoprene synthesis results from alterations in the immediate isoprene precursor dimethylallyldiphosphate (DMADP) pool size, and to what extent DMADP concentrations are affected by the supply of carbon and energetic metabolites. A novel in vivo method based on postillumination isoprene release was employed to measure the pool size of DMADP simultaneously with the rates of isoprene emission and net assimilation at different light intensities and CO₂ and O₂ concentrations. Both net assimilation and isoprene emission rates increased hyperbolically with light intensity. The photosynthetic response to CO₂ concentration was also hyperbolic, while the CO₂ response curve of isoprene emission exhibited a maximum at close to CO₂ compensation point. Low O₂ positively affected both net assimilation and isoprene emission. In all cases, the variation in isoprene emission was matched with changes in DMADP pool size. The results of these experiments suggest that DMADP pool size controls the response of isoprene emission to light intensity and to CO₂ and O₂ concentrations and that the pool size is determined by the level of energetic metabolites generated in photosynthesis.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Ülo Niinemets (ylo.niinemets{at}emu.ee).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.109.141978

^* Corresponding author; e-mail ylo.niinemets{at}emu.ee.

Received May 23, 2009; accepted July 5, 2009; published July 8, 2009.