|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 19, 2009; 10.1104/pp.109.142661 Plant Physiology 151:925-935 (2009) © 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
The Role of Specific Tomato Volatiles in Tomato-Whitefly Interaction1,[W],[OA]Keygene, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands (P.M.B., P.J.D., J.G., M.T.J.B.); University of Amsterdam, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Department of Plant Physiology, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands (P.M.B., K.A., M.A.H., R.C.S.); and University of Göttingen, Department of Forest Zoology and Forest Conservation, 37077 Goettingen, Germany (M.W., S.S.)
Bemisia tabaci (whitefly) infestations and the subsequent transfer of viruses are the cause of severe losses in crop production and horticultural practice. To improve biological control of B. tabaci, we investigated repellent properties of plant-produced semiochemicals. The mix of headspace volatiles, collected from naturally repellent wild tomato accessions, influenced B. tabaci initial choice behavior, indicating a role for plant semiochemicals in locating host plants. A collection of wild tomato accessions and introgression lines (Solanum pennellii LA716 x Solanum lycopersicum Moneyberg) were extensively screened for attractiveness to B. tabaci, and their headspace profiles were determined by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Correlation analysis revealed that several terpenoids were putatively involved in tomato-whitefly interactions. Several of these candidate compounds conferred repellence to otherwise attractive tomato plants when applied to the plant's branches on paper cards. The sesquiterpenes zingiberene and curcumene and the monoterpenes p-cymene,
1 This work was supported by Senter Novem, Enza Zaden, Vilmorin & Cie, Takii & Co., and De Ruiter Seeds. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Robert C. Schuurink (r.c.schuurink{at}uva.nl). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA] Open access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.109.142661 * Corresponding author; e-mail r.c.schuurink{at}uva.nl. Received June 9, 2009; accepted August 17, 2009; published August 19, 2009. Related articles in Plant Physiol.:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|