Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online September 15, 2009; 10.1104/pp.109.144709

Plant Physiology 151:1658-1666 (2009)
© 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
151/3/1658    most recent
pp.109.144709v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobbe, D.
Right arrow Articles by Puchta, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobbe, D.
Right arrow Articles by Puchta, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kobbe, D.
Right arrow Articles by Puchta, H.
GENETICS, GENOMICS, AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION

Biochemical Characterization of AtRECQ3 Reveals Significant Differences Relative to Other RecQ Helicases1,[W]

Daniela Kobbe, Sandra Blanck, Manfred Focke and Holger Puchta*

Botany II, University of Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

Members of the conserved RecQ helicase family are important for the preservation of genomic stability. Multiple RecQ homologs within one organism raise the question of functional specialization. Whereas five different homologs are present in humans, the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) carries seven RecQ homologs in its genome. We performed biochemical analysis of AtRECQ3, expanded upon a previous analysis of AtRECQ2, and compared their properties. Both proteins differ in their domain composition. Our analysis demonstrates that they are 3' to 5' helicases with similar activities on partial duplex DNA. However, they promote different outcomes with synthetic DNA structures that mimic Holliday junctions or a replication fork. AtRECQ2 catalyzes Holliday junction branch migration and replication fork regression, while AtRECQ3 cannot act on intact Holliday junctions. The observed reaction of AtRECQ3 on the replication fork is in line with unwinding the lagging strand. On nicked Holliday junctions, which have not been intensively studied with RecQ helicases before, AtRECQ3, but not AtRECQ2, shows a clear preference for one unwinding mechanism. In addition, AtRECQ3 is much more efficient at catalyzing DNA strand annealing. Thus, AtRECQ2 and AtRECQ3 are likely to perform different tasks in the cell, and AtRECQ3 differs in its biochemical properties from all other eukaryotic RECQ helicases characterized so far.


1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant "Pu 137/10" to H.P. and M.F. and the Concept for the Future of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology within the framework of the German Excellence Initiative "YIG 9-109" to D.K.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Holger Puchta (holger.puchta{at}bio.uka.de).

[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.109.144709

* Corresponding author; e-mail holger.puchta{at}bio.uka.de.

Received July 13, 2009; accepted September 9, 2009; published September 15, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Plant Biologists